UN plan to disarm the American people

“Complete disarmament” of the American people.

The UN Arms Trade Treaty that has been identified by observers as a flagrant threat to the second amendment and which Barack Obama is determined to sign has its roots in a 1961 State Department memorandum which explains how the United Nations will oversee “complete disarmament” of the American people under the ruse of preventing war.

The UN Arms Treaty has caused so much controversy because it outlines a plan to target “all types of conventional weapons, notably including small arms and light weapons,” according to Forbes’ Larry Bell.

Former US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton also warns that the agreement “is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between nation states, but there is no doubt that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control.”

A letter sent last month by 130 Republican House members to President Obama argued that the treaty should be rejected because it infringes on the “fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms”. The letter adds that “…the U.N.’s actions to date indicate that the ATT is likely to pose significant threats to our national security, foreign policy, and economic interests as well as our constitutional rights.”

Using the rhetoric of the threat post by terrorists, insurgents and “international crime syndicates,” the UN is busy trying to imply that all weapons are somehow involved in illegal activity on a global scale and should therefore be controlled and regulated by a global authority.

This is precisely the same language used in a 1961 U.S. State Department briefing which outlined a long term agenda to carry out a “Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World.”

Invoking the threat of nuclear warfare, the document spells out a plan to create a “United Nations Peace Force” that would “enforce the peace as the disarmament process proceeds.”

While the document initially focuses on scrapping nuclear weapons, it later makes it clear that the only groups allowed to own weapons of any kind would be governing authorities, “for the purpose of maintaining internal order,” and the UN “peacekeeping” force itself, which would require “agreed manpower.”

“The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes,” states the document.

While the memorandum outlines a broader mandate to destroy national sovereignty, eviscerate national armies and institute the UN as the planet’s supreme authority with a world army, the document serves as a stark reminder that the plan for the United Nations to oversee the abolition of the second amendment has been in the works for decades.

gun controlAs Bell points out in his Forbes article, the threat of the Obama administration relying on a UN treaty to do what successive administrations have tried but failed to accomplish – taking a huge bite out of the second amendment – is by no means far fetched.

After all, a plethora of UN treaties and international agreements have already stripped the United States of its sovereignty and its power to decide its own laws. The power to authorize U.S. involvement in wars and conflicts has now been almost completely stripped from Congress and handed to the United Nations.

Following Barack Obama’s arrogant rebuff of Congress in seeking approval to strike Libya, during which he churlishly remarked, “I don’t even have to get to the Constitutional question,” Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta affirmed that the U.S. now requires “international permission” before deciding on its military policy.

Other Obama-endorsed UN power grabs like the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) as well as Agenda 21 and sustainable development are also serving to decimate national sovereignty and remain almost completely under the radar.

You only need to look at the European Union, which now crafts around 50 per cent of the laws made in member states like Britain, to understand how unelected global institutions can and have dictated policy on a national level.

The UN Arms Trade Treaty presents an existential threat to the guns rights of American citizens and should be rejected for what it is – yet another attempt by the Obama administration, in the aftermath of the Fast and Furious scandal, to abolish the second amendment by stealth.

knotted gun United Nations

Source: http://www.infowars.com/un-gun-grab-follows-state-department-plan/


6 comments

  1. This is total NRA “fear mongering” Bullshit in the highest degree! The UN resolution has NOTHING whatsoever to do with civilian weapons! It is entirely about Government sale of weapons to “rogue factions”.
    The arms trade treaty, like the PoA, is predicated upon a hypothesis that the illicit trade in small arms is a large and serious problem requiring global action through the UN. According to a well regarded 2012 Routledge Studies in Peace and Conflict Resolution publication, “the relative importance of diversion or misuse of officially authorised transfers, compared to international entirely illegal black market trafficking has been thoroughly confirmed.”[8] The authors go on to elaborate that “For most developing or fragile states, a combination of weak domestic regulation of authorised firearms possession with theft, loss or corrupt sale from official holdings tends to be a bigger source of weapons concern than illicit trafficking across borders.”

  2. Furthermore, this Bell guy is totally out to lunch:

    As Bell points out in his Forbes article, the threat of the Obama administration relying on a UN treaty to do what successive administrations have tried but failed to accomplish – taking a huge bite out of the second amendment – is by no means far fetched.

    After all, a plethora of UN treaties and international agreements have already stripped the United States of its sovereignty and its power to decide its own laws. The power to authorize U.S. involvement in wars and conflicts has now been almost completely stripped from Congress and handed to the United Nations.

    I just do not know where to begin on how much bullshit this is! How about here:

    131+ UN resolutions have already been dis-regarded by the USA concerning Israel and Palestine. 131+!!! The invasion of Iraq was totally against a UN call for further inspections and also dis-regarded. The USA generally, as a “common thing” totally ignores what the UN, and it’s overwhelming votes demand.

    Again. the 2nd Amendment has NOTHING to do with anything other than the Militia it describes (which no longer exists after the Dick Act) and obviously Bell has NO idea whatsoever where the “Right to Bear Arms” comes from. It did NOT get declared in the 2nd Amendment, and is only referred to there.

    Yet how in the World Bell can say the USA has been “stripped” of anything by the UN, is beyond me! The USA ignores more overwhelming resolutions than it ever adopts, and has absolute VETO power in the UN… making it impervious to any possible idea it does not like, that the UN comes up with.

    I see a photo of Qaddafi in this article. When was Congress ever even consulted about the military actions by NATO in Libya? What part of the North Atlantic Treaty Alliance did Libya attack justifying NATO action? For the USA to be conducting Military Actions in Libya would have been an International War Crime, as outlined in Nuremberg, but somehow is overlooked when NATO does it? Qaddafi was not even a member of Government in Libya, and had not held political office since the 1970′s. Where was the justification in Libya Mr. Bell?

    Also we see a photo of Hitler, who “INCREASED” gun ownership in Germany under the National Socialist reign! What? They took away everything from the Jews, but did not leave them with guns? Did they really have any in the first place? Would they have done any good?

    Bell, is a clear liar, and an operative for the Military Industrial Complex. If he is not a MAJOR consultant to the conglomerate, he certainly is a clear spokesman. Bullshit, absolute bullshit to the highest degree!

  3. CheckOut My 1st. Ball that I throw on my blog Banger’s Balls …

    BankRupt The BANKERs … I have a PLAN that is FOOL PROOF !!!

    so simple a Zombie Texting Sheople Can Do IT !!!

  4. Charlie, I am writing a song in my head … The Devil Left Georgia, Mad as he could be,
    said Im taking over Everything Im Headed to Washington D.C.
    Ill make my mark Im better than you,
    Just you wait and see, Ill be Dictator of this Once FREE Country
    Sure enough that Devil did everything he said, now it time to fight again
    This time we must take his head, ” need chorus here ”

    I could go on but Im sure you can take it from there … I got hunderds of tunes in my head never tobe heard or said … hit me up if you like what I bring to the table …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>