Exclusive report

Prince Philip: Is this the sickest man in the UK?

Respectful: Britain’s Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh visits the Field of Remembrance in the grounds of Westminster Abbey in central London on Thursday

Look at the photograph below? This picture will fill Millions of Brits with pride, nostalgia and patronism. Women, old and young will inevitably coo. Men, no doubt with a look of steely determination on their faces will give a quick nod at the photo and say to themselves; “Yes mate, you know”. I look at it and want to wring the hypocrites scrawny neck. The mere sight of him makes me want to puke.

You will not spot a single tear in this abomination’s eye. And for the Daily Mail newspaper and no doubt the vast majority of others to even suggest it, is tantamount to fraud. Worse still, it officially costs the tax payer nearly half a million pound a year to view propaganda like this. Unofficially, the true cost is in the millions.

You have no idea how hard I find it to write about The Duck of Edinburgh and his family of parasitic in-breeds without descending into a torrent of foul mouthed abuse.

Strange, that I cannot  recall the old fart, pictured here all dressed up in his sailor suit so as to con the gullible nation into thinking he is some kind of battled hardened war hero, doing the same last year. Well certainly not with the same amount of press exposure as we see in the Daily Mail today. I may be wrong of course, but I doubt it.

In truth this is nothing more than a fake photo opportunity, staged by a nervous Royal family, who are acutely aware that if they are not very careful, their house of cards could quickly come tumbling down right about now. In fact, there is as much sincerity on show as there are tears in the perverted old git’s eyes. Cry for our heroic war dead? Don’t make me laugh. The old pervert is  doing nothing more than trying to get the nation on side before the truth comes out about him and his odious family.

Why on Earth would the Lizard looking old bastard cry for our war dead?  If he was going to cry for any war dead, it would be those who spoke German, not English. Not that he would do. The Duck of Edinburgh along with the other Royal Monsters despise us.

Prince Philip

They despise all commoners, whatever their nationality, however they die. We are nothing more than an irritation to be endured while they fleece us for all they can get. Why would the man… I use the term very loosely, shed a tear when the people he is pretending to respect are exactly how he wants them and the rest of us, i.e. Dead.

Let me tell you about this racist old pervert. Phil the Greek as he is commonly known, should in fact be called Phil the Nazi. He has no affinity with the British people what so ever, let alone our war dead.  To understand why, we need to go back as far as Queen Victoria, whom some refer to as the last English queen… Even though she was half German. Victoria, according to historians was hated by her countryman, some even say she was spat upon… Can’t imagine that amused her much.

Queen Vicky, as she wasn’t known, married the German Prince Albert:

Albert was born on August 26, 1819 in Rosenau, Germany. He was the second son of the Duke of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, and was greatly influenced by his uncle Leopold, who became the king of Belgium in 1831. As a teenager Albert travelled to Britain and met the Princess Victoria, who was his COUSIN and nearly the same age as Albert. (Source- About.com)

Saxe-Coburg-Gotha was our Royal family’s name then, until Sticky Vicky’s grandson, King George V, who was married to the German Queen Mary, changed it to Windsor in 1917. This was only because  there was a good deal of anti German sentiment in Britain before the First World War which became almost hysterical after 1916. There were in fact, anti German riots with shops owned by people with German names or German sounding names being smashed up. This also happened in other parts of the Empire such as Johannesburg in South Africa.

So there you have another case of this closely interbred, dysfunctional family pulling out all the stops to save their own necks… But I digress.

Now, as well as the name changing King George V being the grandson of Sticky Vicky, so was our German opponent  in the first world war, Kaiser Wilhelm II… Getting the picture yet? No? Fair enough, I will continue.

Our present Queen, Bizzy Lizzy and her husband Phil the Sauerkraut are both the great, great grandchildren of Queen StickyVicky. Or put another way, they are 2nd cousins, once removed… By then it was surprising that the in-breeds didn’t resemble the cast of  ‘the Hills have eyes’. They did, and still do however, behave like them.

Further more, madness and genetic problems are common place within the Royal family, thanks entirely to their in-breeding. Everyone knows about King George the III. He was mad as a hatter. Sticky Vicky herself was a Haemophiliac, which resulted in the death of her son Prince Leopold at the age of 30. The Duck’s own mother was mad as a hatter and had to be sectioned, which might explain a lot.

However, the more modern day Royal family tend to do what all Monsters do with their mad relations. Lock them away and pretend they don’t exist. That is what happened with the Queen’s first cousins,Nerissa and Katherine, who were both nieces of the Queer Mother:

The Queen’s  cousin Nerissa was 22 and the Queen’s look-alike  cousin Katherine was 15 when they were sent to the grim Royal Earlswood Mental Hospital.  Both were severely handicapped and virtually unable to speak. They were said to have a mental age of six.

Cousin Nerissa is now deceased but cousin Katherine, aged 86, is still alive as of 2012, although severely mentally retarded. She is neglected and never visited.

Burke’s Peerage which records the “who’s who” lineage of the British aristocracy, recorded false information that the first cousins of Queen Elizabeth II died in 1940 and 1961. 

Despite the Queen’s fabulous wealth, she spent not one penny on cousin Nerissa’s burial. Nerissa was buried like a pauper in an unceremounious grave marked by a 6-inch-high plastic tag bearing a serial number and the name ”Bowes-Lyon”.

Cousin Katherine who spent decades in the Royal Earlswood Asylum, was moved to Ketwin House for the mentally disabled. Following allegations that male staff members were washing female patients, Ketwin House was forced to shut down. Witnesses found bruises on Katherine’s hand and hip.

Despite the Queen’s fabulous wealth, she spent not one penny to keep her cousin Katherine at Ketwin House. The cost ? About 770 pounds per patient per year. According to a former staff member, Katherine is alert, understands what she’s being told and communicates by pointing and smiling. Not one member of the Royal family has visited her in 60 years.

It turns out that the Queen’s mother also had cousins who were locked away in the same mental institution on the same day in 1941 as Nerissa and Katherine.

An ‘out of sight, out of mind’ approach to family members with “embarrassing” problems like mental illness and epilepcy is nothing new in the royal household.

In 1905, George V(Of name change fame) and Queen Mary had a son, Prince John. Until the age of four, Prince John was just as much in the spotlight then as Prince William was in 1986 at the age of four.

When Prince John suffered his first epileptic fit, his royal parents excluded him from official family photographs.He wasn’t even allowed to attend his own father’s coronation as King of England in 1911. In 1917, the King hid his epileptic son by sending him to die in an isolated farmhouse. John never saw his parents again. He died two years later – reportedly in his sleep.

Another propaganda Oscar winner, The Kings’ Speech, focused on the Queen’s father and his speech impediment. There was no mention in the movie that the cause may have been from generations of royal inbreeding.

Monarchy blockbusters are designed to sell the image of the filthy rich royals as sensitive, caring, human and deserving of adoration and taxpayer support. No one would dare make a Hollywood movie about the King’s nazi brother, Edward VIII who abdicated.

Alice Battenberg was the mother of the Queen’s husband – Prince Philip. Alice was near deaf and a religious zealot. As the years went by, she began to have visions that she was Christ’s bride. She was declared a paranoid schizophrenic and committed to an asylum by force in 1930. Alice is Prince William’s great grandmother.

(Source T. Stokes)

Now, moving on, Queen Bizzy Lizzy’s uncle Eddie the Duke of Windsor, the one who married the American slut Wallis Simpson (I believe Homer was her nephew, but I may be wrong), was great friends with Adolf Hitler. The fact Eddie did marry Wallis was much to the annoyance of Bizzy Lizzy’s Alcoholic, Paedophile, mother (Various Sources such as Bill Maloney), who also wanted him. Never the less, in the end the Queer Mother was forced to settle for the younger brother… Affectionately referred to as ‘the backward one’.

In fact, according to files released in 2003, high ranking Nazi officials considered Rock steady Eddie to be “no enemy to Germany”. They also considered him to be the “logical director of England’s destiny after the war”.

Eddie, who was also a paedophile and part time bum bandit, gave up the million pound hat to marry the much passed around slapper Simpson. I cannot imagine why, unless it was the fact that she would indulge Ed the Ball in his passion for being pushed around in a pram while dressed only in a nappy… I kid you not.

So, is it just a coincidence then, that Willie and Kate got married on the 29th of April 2011, sixty six years to the day that Hitler married Eva Braun? Remember, dates and numbers are extremely important to these freaks. Willie was in fact induced so as his birthday fell on the Summer Solstice, although the official line is that he was induced so as not to interfere with his father, Prince Big ears’ Polo Tournament.

Course, according to the Help Free the Earth website, the Royal family didn’t just offer moral support to those who were killing the British soldiers Philip is pictured shedding Crocodile tears over. That moral support also stretched to financial:

The British monarchy, and the City of London’s leading Crown bankers, enthusiastically backed Hitler and the Nazis, bankrolled the Fuhrer’s election, and did everything possible to build the Nazi war machine, for Britain’s planned geopolitical war between Germany and Russia. Support for Nazi-style genocide has always been at the heart of the House of Windsor policy. Long after the abdication of King Edward VIII, the Windsors maintained their direct Nazi links.

Meanwhile, Phil the Duck was sent to a German boarding school that specialised in bringing up mini Adolfs. In fact, as Phil put it himself, there was much heel clicking and Heil Hitlering. At the same time, his 4 sisters all married members of the Nazi Party.

His sister Sophie in fact, went on to marry Prince Christoph of Hesse, a colonel in the SS on Himmler’s personal staff and head of the Forschungsamt, an elite intelligence operation controlled by Hermann Goering.

Christoph, as coincidence would have it  was also the great grandson of Queen Victoria and a paedophile… I’m lying. It wasn’t really a coincidence, but the other two facts are true. The 30 year old Christoph had become engaged to Prince Phillips sister, Sophie when she had only just turned 15 – Hmmm.

Mind you, Filthy Phil began dating the queen when she was only 13 years old. Then again, the Royals like to keep everything within the family. But I digress.

Now, as I have just said, what eventually happens when families are continually polluting their own gene pool is madness begins to occur and that is what happened to Phil’s mum, Slack Alice. So when she was carted off to the mad house and his father fucked off with some old sort, Philip, much to his delight, was left in the care of his uncle Lord Louie Mountbatten. The Mountbatten’s were also German’s who changed their name from Battenberg… As in the Marzipan cake that people pretend to like, but don’t really… Much in keeping with the way people feel about the Royals in general really.

Now, pay attention here. Lord Louis the Cake was also the Great Grandson of  Sticky Fuckin’ Vicky and 2nd cousin of the name changing King George V. Louis was also a predatory paedophile.

The Authors of the controversial book ‘The War of the Windsor’s’ which was serialised in the Daily Mail state:

Lord Louis Mountbatten had the nickname “Dickie” …and for good reason. Philip’s uncle Dickie was the last viceroy in India where he was a known paedophile who sexually exploited young working class Indian peasant boys”.

Mountbatten is also linked to the paedophile ring who abused boys living at the Kincora Care Home in Belfast Northern Ireland. An excellent website, dedicated to exposing the Royal Family http://www.helpfreetheearth.com/index.html, have this to say about a book written on that paedophile ring entitled ‘The Kincora Scandal’:

 “The Kincora Scandal connects Lord Dickie Mountbatten to a child prostitution vice ring in Belfast, Ireland. Authorities failed to intervene at the Kincora care home for boys until 1981, despite reports over the years of child sexual abuse”.

The operators of the Kincora child prostitution ring were eventually convicted in 1981 of the RITUAL sexual abuse of defenceless young boys who were sold like prostitutes. No charges were ever brought against the VIP customers made up of Royals, Politicians, lawyers, and Judges. However, Belfast citizens finally had reason to celebrate when Prince Philip’s paedophile uncle was killed by  an IRA bomb planted in his boat”. 

It is alleged by many that Louis the Cake had at least two boys on the boat, possibly three, when they were all blown to kingdom come. It is further alleged by many, that Phil got his first taste of Cock, courtesy of  Uncle Louis, who was almost certainly also shagging Bizzy Lizzy’s Uncle, Ed the Baby.

Other members of the ohhh sooo British Royal family, but who are in reality closet Nazi’s include; Marie Christine Reibnitz AKA Princess Michael of Kent. Then there is the  brother of Princess Alice, a great-aunt to the Queen, who was a Nazi and said that Hitler had done a “wonderful job”.

Princess Michael of Kent’s (Sounds like a tranny doesn’t she) father, was Baron Gunther von Reibnitz, who just so happened to be a member of the Nazi party and an honorary member of the SS.

Slightly diverting away from the main topic, but relevant none the less, Princess Michael, who is married to the Queens Cousin Prince Michael of Kent was caught out shagging a toy-boy in 2006. As it happens, Prince Michael also looks extremely like my friend Terry from Cyprus. But I’m fairly sure that is just a coincidence.

Never the less, having his wife publicly identified as shagging about  obviously pissed Prince Mick off. Now everyone knows, cept my good self of course, that you shouldn’t upset a Freemason. Especially not the highest wanking Freemason in the country, which is apparently who Prince Micky Boy is (Sorry about the speech impediment in that sentence. I was just trying out my impression of Bizzy Lizzy’s old man). He is also the Grandson of the name changing, half German  King George V and the full German Queen Mary, don’t cha know.

Having said that, any inference you draw from the following is strictly down to your own over active imaginations. You see, this toy-boy Mikhail Kravchenko, who shared a 4 day break in a Venice hotel with Mick’s slapper wife Princess Michael, met a very sticky end when he was machine gunned to death while sat in his Mercedes. Not that he was the only one whom the Royal family had the hump with, to die in a Mercedes.

Anyway, an actress called Marina Golub who was a close friend of  Mikhail Kravchenko started asking questions about his death and after getting too near to the truth, she was apparently warned off. Whether or not she took any notice of the warnings is unknown, but she did claim to have uncovered startling new details about the murder. However, before she could reveal what she knew she was killed in a ‘car crash’… Just saying.

Right, getting back onto the main thread. All these people, who were and are supposedly part of the English Royal family, were in reality aligned with the German War Machine. As an example of just how deep that involvement was, consider the following also taken from the Help Free The earth website:

Prince Philip’s uncle and sponsor, Lord Louis Mountbatten (originally, Battenberg of the House of Hesse) was a central figure in the 1930s Nazi-British channel. Until he was forced to abdicate, King Edward VIII enjoyed the full backing of Dickie Mountbatten. Through much of World War II, secret channels of communication were maintained between the British royal family and their pro-Hitler cousins in Germany, by Lord Mountbatten, through his sister Louise, who was crown princess of pro-Nazi Sweden. Louise was Prince Philip’s aunt.


The spin doctors at Buckingham Palace have tried to depict the wartime collaboration of the British royal family with the Nazi enemy as just family correspondence but the messages from Prince Philip’s secret ally, the Duke of Windsor (former King Edward VIII) are impossible to cover up. On Nov. 20, 1995, the Washington Times reported that the Duke of Windsor had been in close collaboration with the Nazis in Spain and Portugal to foment a revolution in wartime Britain, that would topple the Churchill government, depose his brother King George VI, and allow him to regain the throne.

Starting with an exchange between King George VI and President Eisenhower, the House of Windsor has been desperate to keep incriminating documents collected from Kronberg Castle classified. The incriminating documents fell into American Army hands.

With that in mind, now take a look at the photo below. This is Phil the Duck in his Nazi Sister Cecile’s funeral cortège.  In the row behind and slightly to the left is Louis The Cake, wearing an old style sailor hat. This was taken a couple of years before the War. Jews were already being persecuted and slaughtered. Philip admitted himself that his family had a problem with Jews. That leaves me to wonder how he feels about his grand-daughter in law Kate, who is Jewish.

Another senior Royal who was apparently racist was Bizzy Lizzy’s sister, Princess Margaret . I deal with Slaggy Maggie in detail in Monsters Inc, but here is what is said about her on the Scandalous Woman website:

Princess Margaret was a spoiled, vain, racist, promiscuous waster who never worked a day in her life, called the Irish people “Pigs, all pigs”, was an adulteress, who also, most insidiously, sponged tens of MILLIONS from the people of Great Britain through the civil list at a time when most British “subjects” were near starving due to rationing.

Her Uncle was an unrepentant Nazi sympathizer and friend of Oswald mosley who would have (if given the chance) allowed the perptrators of the holocaust a foothold in Britain.

Course, as I have already said, Phil the Nazi is well known for being racist. According to the book The Duke of Hazard: The Wit & Wisdom of Prince Philip, Famous gaffe’s include:

• During a state visit to China in 1986, the duke told a group of British students: “If you stay here much longer, you’ll all be slitty-eyed.”

• Another jab to the Chinese came at a World Wildlife Fund dinner: “If it swims and it’s not a submarine, the Chinese will eat it.” 

• To an Australian Aborigine he met in 2002, Philip asked: “Still throwing spears?”

• When a Kenyan woman gave Philip a gift, he was perplexed at her appearance. “You’re a woman, aren’t you?” he asked.

• When he met Lord Taylor of Warwick, who is black and comes from Birmingham, “And what exotic part of the world do you come from?”

• When he saw an old-fashioned fuse box in a factory near Edinburgh, the duke said: “It looks as if it was put in by an Indian.”

• When he met a group of deaf people in Cardiff in1999, Philip referred to the school’s steel band: “Deaf? If you are near there, no wonder you are deaf.”

• “Aren’t most of you descended from pirates?” Philip asked someone from the Cayman Islands in 1994.

• When he met the president of Nigeria, who was dressed in a traditional robe, Philip said: “You look like you’re ready for bed!”

So don’t even try to tell me that the Nazi Bastard shed any tears over our war dead. The very fact that the MSM take his photograph any where near a tribute to those who died in the war is a gross insult to their memory.

Worse still, when you know that he is only doing it in order to gain support for his yokel family in case the nation find out that these piss takers, who do not give a fuck for anyone but themselves are up to their perverted necks in the Jimmy Savile cesspit, your blood begins to boil.

Jimmy Savile with Prince Charles

Not convinced? No?  Then I will carry on.

That the Duck of Edinburgh didn’t know about Louis the letch’s preference for boys is inconcievable. As I said, the chances are Louis was abusing Philip anyway. Never the less, that didn’t stop him leaving his eldest son, Prince Big Ears in his care:

Mountbatten was a strong influence in the upbringing of his grand-nephew, Prince Charles, Prince of Wales, and later as a mentor—”Honorary Grandfather” and “Honorary Grandson”, they fondly called each other according to the Jonathan Dimbleby biography of the Prince”.

Now you tell me what kind of sick fuck leaves their child in the capable hands of a predatory Paedophile? The answer can only be someone who views paedophilia as being normal. Just look at their history. It is littered with child molesters. Child Molesting is not the same as being Gay. A person has no choice as to whether they are gay or not. A child molester on the other hand does have a choice.

However, as we have already seen. Many of the Royals do seem to be gay. That said, I do not believe that to be true. I do however believe that many of them take part in same sex, sex. Princess Diana, for instance, hinted that her ex husband used to have a merry old time forcibly sodomising his male staff.

Talking of Paedophiles and the Prince of Wales, I feel that I must mention another Royal paedophile Prince Albert Victor, who was also known as Prince Eddy. You can tell how in-bred these monsters are. They all have the same fucking name, don’t cha know. Anyway Prince Eddy was the eldest son of Albert Edward, the Prince of Wales. Here’s what the author John Hamer wrote about him: 

 Prince Albert Victor, the Duke of Clarence otherwise known by his colloquial name of ‘Prince Eddy was the eldest son of Albert Edward the Prince of Wales (later King Edward VII) and Princess Alexandra (later Queen Alexandra), the grandson of the reigning monarch, Queen Victoria and older brother of the future king of England, King George V and as such would have been first in line to the throne.

Unfortunately, due to centuries of Royal in-breeding, Eddy was partially deaf and of well below average intelligence and was thus shunned by the majority of his cold-hearted family.

Queen Victoria, the reigning monarch at the time was a great supporter and patron of Freemasonry as were all the Royal males of the age (and as they still are today).  Indeed it was the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha family (the current British royals) who had sponsored the rise of Adam Weishaupt, the founder of the Illuminati, originally a Freemasonry offshoot, in Bavaria in the 18th century. Weishaupt was indeed born and raised in the Bavarian town of Gotha.

There are several Masonic lodges in the Royal palaces of Britain, the most significant one perhaps being the Royal Alpha Lodge in Kensington Palace (where Prince and Princess Mick live. I’m getting good at this history lark – Spivey).  In 1885 Prince Eddy was initiated into the Royal Alpha Lodge at the behest of his father.

As well as his membership of the lodge, Eddy was also a regular ‘customer’ at a homosexual-paedophile brothel in Cleveland Street, London and indiscreetly instigated a series of explicit love-letters with a young boy employed at these most vile of premises.

In the meantime, Prince Eddy, his mental health by now completely shattered, was given into the care of the Earl of Strathmore who owned Glamis Castle in Scotland.  The royal family then blatantly lied to the world and announced that Eddy had sadly passed away at the age of only 28, on the 14th January 1892 due to influenza, but of course Eddy was still alive and being held in Balmoral Castle having not yet made the final move to Glamis.

Balmoral is approximately 1000 feet (300 metres) above sea-level and as such is partly surrounded by steep cliffs.  This was the intended site for the planned murder of Eddy to be undertaken by Randolph Churchill (Winstons old man – Spivey) and John Netley the coachman.   The prince was pushed from the cliff-top but somehow managed to survive his fall and after the passage of two days had endeavoured to crawl all the way back to Balmoral where he was found at the door by his disbelieving hosts.

It was decided after this that the best option would be to just incarcerate him at Glamis for the rest of his life and the Earl of Strathmore agreed to undertake this task on behalf of the royals in return for one simple favour.  The favour he stipulated was that one of his daughters be allowed to marry a future king of England.

Poor Eddy died in 1933, forty one years after his ‘official’ death date and during this time, his mother visited him only once, but took a photograph of him which she apparently sent to her cousin.  This photograph is still in existence and shows a much older Eddy thoughtfully painting a picture which would sadly never be seen by anyone outside the walls of Glamis Castle.

The pact between Strathmore and the royal family was eventually fulfilled in 1923 when Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon (his daughter, b. 1900) married the future King George VI of England after originally being betrothed to his brother, the former King Edward VIII (he of abdication fame) (Told ya she had the hots for him – Spivey).

In 1936 George ascended the throne upon his elder brother’s abdication and Elizabeth became his queen consort.  Elizabeth of course was more commonly known as the Queen Mother and the mother of the current incumbent of the family firm, Queen Elizabeth the second.  She went to her grave in 2002 without ever revealing the secret and thus the world was never aware of this unholy pact. 

There you have a perfect example of our Royal family; inherently Mad, Paedophile tendency’s, happy to murder their own and extremely conniving… Lets give them a few more millions of pounds. Prince Charles is always lobbying for more anyway. So is Prince Randy Andy. He wants his daughters, one of whom had a tendency to run around her school naked, added to the Civil list… The greedy bastards.

Mind you, what with the likes of Paul Burrell and Paul Kidd working for the perverted family, I don’t imagine Prince Charles had to force himself on the staff too violently.

I have documented the sexual exploits of Paul Burrell, who appointed himself Princess Diana’s Rock, in my forth coming expose of Diana’s murder. So you will just have to wait to read them. However, I will say that Burrell swore never to reveal Diana’s secrets, but has since made millions writing books about them and by just trading off her name in general.

Paul Kidd is a different kettle of fish all together. He was apparently charged at Manchetser crown court with sexually abusing a large number of boys over a 30 year period.  Manchester also just so happened to be the hang out of Jimmy Savile. The Daily Mail had this to say about Paul Kidd:

A former Buckingham Palace butler has been unmasked as a sexual predator who  ran a paedophile ring while serving the Royal Family.

Bachelor Paul Kidd, 55, groomed at least one of his teenage victims for sex by taking him for tea with the Queen Mother at Clarence House, it has emerged. To the public, he had been the urbane gent who waited on the Royals for nine years – first the Queen at the Palace and then her mother.

You can take any inference you like from that, but as I said in my article ‘Parliamentary Paedophiles’ , the MSM like to drop hints. You may also like to Google Bill Maloney and hear what he has to say about the Queer Mother. The nickelinthemachine.com website also says the following about Kidd:

Paul Kidd claimed he walked the same corridors as Sir Anthony Blunt the Rothschild gopher who betrayed Britain to the Soviets in W W II for £20,000. 

Now Anthony Blunt was a Russian Spy. He was also a notorious paedophile…  Surprised? Nah, course your not. He was also definitely related to the Queen in some way or another. Some historians have him down as a cousin, others say he was in fact Bizzy Lizzy’s half brother. The MSM laughingly had an article out just the other week that said the Queer Mother, had cottoned on to Blunt the …. What rhymes with Blunt? Runt… The Queer Mother had cottoned on to Blunt the Runt a long time before the security services’s did.

Are the MSM for real? It is a very dangerous game they play. They, like myself and many others know the truth yet they print bollocks like that in order to give the Royals an alter ego. Do these journalists not realise that they are just as expendable as the rest of us?

Course the Queer Mother knew about Blunt.  You only need read the following, which is taken from the website United Nations on Film to realise that:

At the end of the war, in June 1945, the British King, George VI, the father of Queen Elizabeth and puppet of the Queen Mother, sent the former MI5 officer, Anthony Blunt, to the Kronberg Castle of Prince Philip’s sister Sophie, and her Nazi husband Prince Christoph of Hesse, to recover correspondence between the British Royal Family and their Nazi relatives, for propaganda aimed at convincing the aristocrats of Britain they had not been in contact all along. Blunt was the ‘surveyor of the Queens Pictures’ and a world expert in the paintings of Poussin, the initiate who painted pictures called ‘The Shepherds of Arcadia’ which related to the Rennes-le-Chateau mysteries. Blunt was named as a member of a KGB unit inside British Intelligence along with Burgess, MacLean, and Philby, the fifth man was never named, but was in fact, Lord Victor Rothschild.

Course, the Duck of Edinburgh also used Blunts services. It seems that Filthy Phil was caught up in the Perfumo Scandal of the early 1960′s via his connection with Stephen Ward, the society pimp, Artist and Satanist who was heavily implicated in the Scandal. Ward was good friends with Phil and had been a frequent visitor to the palace where he did some, ahemm ahemm, ‘Drawings’ of The Duck and ‘other members of the family.

Ward later died under very mysterious circumstances, while supposedly on trial, but who was in fact in hospital after trying to top himself. Whatever was contained in the drawings of Ward’s obviously worried Phil greatly as he sent Blunt to retrieve them at any cost.

Course, by then even Bizzy Lizzy was fed up with her oversexed, deviant of a husband and as such had sworn never to sleep with him again. This claim was repeated in a book written by Nicholas Davies and revealed “a shocking world of royal adultery, passion and betrayal”

The book stated – as fact, not surmise – that the Duke of Edinburgh’s liaisons with his cousin, Princess Alexandra and the film star Merle Oberon, not to mention his former Daughter in Laws mother, Susan Barrantes (among others!)- as the reason “why the Queen banned her husband from her bed”.

More damming still, the Telegraph reported in an article on the 5th of September 2004, about how Philip  had sat “impassively, incensed but silent” when a Journalist from a “Sunday broadsheet” had suggested to the Duke that he might have a raft of illegitimate children and had enjoyed a homosexual liaison with Valery Giscard d’Estaing, the former President of France. Do I need to go on? Yes? Ok.

If you want to know who had Diana murdered, the trail would appear to lead firmly to Phil the Sauerkraut’s door. Course, for the benefit of the Royal Lawyer’s, I should tell you that I base that claim on the omitted evidence from the Paget report and subsequent inquest, Claims by Mohammed Al Fayed and the book by Jon King.

Now, what kind of man deprives his grandchildren of their mother? The answer can only be the same kind of man who grossly insults our war dead by sickeningly pretending to shed a tear while cynically saluting them… God that family nauseate me.

One of my dearest wishes is that he is still alive when his family are finally exposed for the greedy, robbing, murdering, parasitic monsters that they are. Perhaps, before we hang them for mass genocide and countless other crimes against humanity, he along with his equally obnoxious wife – a woman rich enough to end world poverty and still have an un-spendable fortune left – will tell the world what they did with the 10 Canadian orphans they took away with them, never ever to be seen again.

Course, the  3 children lucky enough not to be chosen as one of the ten would testify that they were made to kiss the queens foot first before her and the Duck fucked off with the 10 unlucky ones. Or at least they would if they too had lived long enough to testify.

To far fetched for you? It would be for me too, if I hadn’t spent countless hours researching the nonces and the afore mentioned incident wasn’t so well documented. Here is just one example of that, which was reproduced on the Help Free The Earth website:

Star Eyewitness Dies Suddenly. Written by Rev. Kevin Annett

Monday, 28 February 2011 20:39

William Combes was the sole survivor of a group of three aboriginal boys who claim to have witnessed the abduction of ten children during a royal visit to the Kamloops residential school in mid October, 1964, when both the Queen and Prince Philip were in British Columbia, Canada.

“They took away those ten kids and nobody ever saw them again.” - William Combes, Eyewitness.

William Combes, age 59 and in good health, was scheduled to be a primary witness at the opening session of the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS) on September 12, 2011 in London, England.

Combes, an aboriginal man, claimed to witness the abduction of ten fellow residential school children by the Queen of England and her husband in October, 1964 at the Catholic school in Kamloops, British Columbia.

According to his partner Mae, William was in stable health when he was assigned a new doctor at St. Paul’s Hospital where he was committed for “tests”. His health began to immediately deteriorate. He died suddenly of a still-undisclosed cause.

The Vancouver Coroner’s Office refused to comment on William’s recent death.

The Royal Abductions.

William was the sole survivor of a group of three aboriginal witnesses to the royal abductions. In his public statements made during a Vancouver Co-op radio program and also in the following signed and witnessed declaration made on February 3, 2010 Combes said:

“I am an Interior Salish spirit dancer and am 58 years old. I live in Vancouver, Canada. I am a survivor of the Kamloops and Mission Indian residential schools, both run by the Roman Catholic church. I suffered terrible tortures there especially at the hands  of Brother Murphy, who killed at least two children. I witnessed him throw a child off a three story balcony to her death. He put me on a rack and broke some of my bones, in the Kamloop school basement, after I tried running away. I also saw him and another priest burying a child in the school orchard one night.

In October, 1964 when I was 12 years old, I was an inmate at the Kamloops school and we were visited by the Queen of England and Prince Phillip. I remember it was strange because they came by themselves, no big fanfare or nothing. But I recognized them and the school principal told us it was the Queen and we all got given new clothes and good food for the first time in months the day before she arrived.

The day the Queen got to the school, I was part of a group of kids that went on a picnic with her and her husband and some of the priests, down to a meadow near Dead Man’s Creek. I remember it was weird because we all had to bend down and kiss her foot, a white laced boot. After a while, I saw the Queen leave the picnic with ten children from the school, and those kids never returned. We never heard anything more about them and never met them again even when we were older. They were all from around there but they all vanished.

The group that disappeared was seven boys and three girls, in age from six to fourteen years old. They were all from the smart group in class. Two of the boys were brothers and they were Metis from Quesnel. Their last name was Arnuse or Arnold. I don’t remember the others,  just an occasional first name like Cecilia and there was an Edward. What happened was also witnessed by my friend George Adolph, who was 11 years old at the time and a student there too. But he’s dead now.”

Foul Play

Rev. Kevin Annett (note Reverend, and not just any old Joe Bloggs – Spivey) believes that William Combes died of foul play and that his murder was arranged to prevent him from his speaking out about the child abductions and other crimes of murder and torture that he witnessed at the Catholic Indian residential schools.

Arnett is writing a soon to be issued eulogy for William Arnold Combes. William’s videotaped statements, including his witness report of the 1964 abductions, have been registered in the archives of the ITCCS, and will be made public at the opening session on September 12, 2011.

Five other aboriginal members and activists have also died since December, and a sixth is missing and presumed dead. All were public critics of the Roman Catholic church’s killing of residential school children, and had participated in protests against this church and the Anglican Church and the United Church of Canada.

Their names are: Johnny Dawson, died December 8, 2009 after a severe beating by three Vancouver policemen. Mike Wickson, died February, 2010, cause unknown. Elder Phillipa Ryan, died April 26, 2010 from “cancer” in less than a month. Norma Jean Baptiste, died early May, 2010, apparent heart attack. Chief Louis Daniels, died May 16, 2010 in a Winnipeg hospital, cause unknown.

The Squamish nation believes that these activists and eyewitnesses were murdered, now that the Catholic church is facing criminal charges for the Pope’s personal complicity in the rape and torture of children. Canada and its churches may be  censured and investigated by European politicians and human rights groups.

For more information on the ITCCS go to: http://itccs.org/

Now, while that is shocking, it is very much in keeping with the Royal Family’s less publicised life. The Duck hates people… Absolutely despises them… The very same people who he and his family leech off. Piss taking bastard. Here is what Alex Jones and Steve Watson had to say about the idiot:

 In the foreword to his 1986 book If I Were an Animal, Prince Philip wrote, “In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.”

Borrowing the idea from American scientists who pioneered the field in the 1930′s, the Nazis advanced the pseudo-science of eugenics and incorporated it into Adolf Hitler’s dream of the Aryan super-race. Bearing in mind Philip’s Nazi connections, his views on the subject of overpopulation are unsurprising, but shocking nonetheless.

Just last year he reiterated these views, announcing that there are too many people in the world, and attacking large families in a television interview, despite the fact that Prince Philip himself has four children and eight grandchildren. (Debatable, especially if you have read Monsters Inc – Spivey)

His son, Charles, the next King of England, has continued such ideology as he tours the world in private jets lecturing about the impact of climate change and how too many people are killing the planet.

Charles, who has inherited the entire Duchy of Cornwall estate, which stretches over 135,000 acres across 23 counties mainly in the south-west of England, is also a “patron” of the genocidal Optimum Population Trust, a notorious UK-based public policy group that campaigns for a gradual decline in the global human population to what it sees as a “sustainable” level.

Charles’ fellow patrons at the OPT include Futurist and top Eco-Fascist James Lovelock, who recently called for the ending of freedom in order that an overriding global power made up of “a few people with authority” can oversee the radical stemming of the planet’s human population in order to combat climate change.

Charles and the OPT are closely affiliated with The Royal Society, a 350 year old elitist institution granted royal charter status by King Charles II. The Royal Society is also crawling with eugenics enthusiasts and depopulation fanatics.

Prince Philip Care about the war dead? … Don’t make me laugh. The old bastard wants us all dead.

Before the Duck appeared  in yesterdays Daily Mail, acting like he gives a fuck, I had in fact wondered how long it would be before the Palace began to distance themselves from Jimmy So-vile. Apparently, that day was  the 1st of November when most of the MSM newspapers carried a story which would have us believe that there was some concerns about So-vile’s behaviour when he visited his mate Prince Big Ears at St James’ Palace.

Strangely enough however, these concerns were never officially addressed, which I suppose would be the excuse as to why the Heir to the Throne continued to socialise with the Paedophile. The same fairy tale would also have us believe that So-vile acted as a kind of marriage counsellor for the Prince and Diana… What a load of old bollocks.

Little wonder then, that people are turning to the ‘alternative’ media for information.

Now, the question you have to ask yourself is: Why would a man like The Duck, want to be friends with Jimmy Savile, because they were in fact very good friends. That is till they fell out spectacularly. That further begs the question: Why on earth would Savile and Phil have the need to fall out to the extent that they no longer spoke? For that to happen it must have been one hell of a close friendship.

Savile Prince Charles pedophile links

I am in fact amazed that Savile had the time to be friends with anyone since he seemed to spend all his spare abusing Children… Still, perhaps the Police will ask Phil about it? … Nahhhh course they won’t.

Furthermore, police chiefs have known about So-vile since at least the early 1970’s if not before, so for the parasites to now try and distance themselves from the sicko DJ with the old “we didn’t know” routine, just doesn’t hold water.

The Duck’s eldest son Big Ears on the other hand, managed to remain great friends with Savile right up until his death. Hell, the future King of England even took the time out to go for a meal at Saviles Poky, out of the way highland cottage. The very same cottage that the Police raided the other week after suspecting Savile of raping some of his young victims there… Two fact’s that the MSM even linked in a headline… Is there another one of those MSM hints there?

I would imagine that the Christmas Card that Big Ears sent the Vile, bleach Blonde Necrophile, which said;“Jimmy, with affectionate greetings from Charles. Give my love to your ladies in Scotland.” was a reference to the Scottish Cottage. Then again, for the benefit of the Royal Legal Eagles, that is just my opinion.

Never the less, anyone, and I mean anyone, who is in contact with the Royal family is closely vetted. The security services would be woefully failing in their duty if they failed to do so. Predictably, the true cost of protecting the in-breeds is impossible to find out. However, realistic estimates put the yearly bill somewhere between £120 Million – £200 Million. Personally, I strongly suspect the cost as being a lot higher.

Now, if you read the ‘Alternative Media’ regularly, you will know that So-vile was known to be a supplier of children to the rich and famous. Most noteable of those was the Paedophile, child killer and Satanist, Edward Heath, the former Prime Minister of England.

It has also be reported in the MSM recently that So-vile was implicated in the Yorkshire Ripper murders. So much so in fact, that the Police even took a mould of his teeth in order to compare them with bite marks found on the murder victims bodies.

Couple that with the other things the Police knew about Savile and you quickly come to the conclusion that there is not a cat in hells chance that the Security Services – assigned to Royal protection – had not made the in-breeds aware of So-viles sexual preferences. Yet they still associated with him, as did just about every other high powered Establishment figure over the past 30 or 40 years or so.

Now, why is that? There can only be one reason unless you are one of those who is still living in cloud cuckoo land.

Course,The Monarchy, who have a long tradition of entertaining mass murderers and deviants of all persuasions, recently invited charity worker and convicted sex offender, Harbinder Singh aboard the Royal barge during the Diamond Jubilee pageant. Why?

Big Ears and Paedo Jim were in fact such good mates, that, looking at the many, many photos of the pair, I cannot recall Big Ears having  any where near the the same level of  intimacy as he and So-vile  appeared to share… And that includes his wives… Why?

Some Royal watchers have suggested that Diana was murdered because she was going to tell the world about her ex husband and his family’s sexual preferences… Note Royal Lawyer’s, I’m not one of those.

Never the less, Princess Diana did refer to Savile as being her husbands mentor. A mentor, according to the Cambridge on-line dictionary is: A person who gives another person help and advice over a period of time and often also teaches them how to do their job.

That claim of Diana’s takes on an even more sinister twist when you consider who arranged for So-vile to mentor Big Ears:

Prince Philip’s uncle Lord Louis Mountbatten ‘fixed it’ for Savile to mentor Prince Charles and they became lifelong friends. Savile invited the Prince of Wales to his cottage in Glencoe, which he hoped to turn into a home for disabled and disadvantaged children, called Jimmy’s Place! Uncle Dickie, with his predilection for ‘peasant’ boys, was linked to the Kincora Boy’s Home vice-ring, which allegedly sent Belfast orphans to Birr Castle in the Irish Republic, the home of Lord Snowdon’s stepbrother, for ritual abuse at the Hellfire Club. Snowdon was Princess Margaret’s ex-husband (You couldn’t make this shit up, don’t cha know – Spivey).

Conservative Prime Minister Edward Heath, a yachting enthusiast, was also a visitor at Kincora Boy’s Home and it’s claimed that Savile supplied him with victims from Haute de la Garenne in Jersey to misuse aboard his boat. Another of Savile’s close friends, Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, often played host to him at Chequers and her successors, Major, Blair and Brown were all “fans” deaf to the ‘open secret’ which everyone knew. Prince Charles and Prince Andrew, friend of the billionaire paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, sent Christmas cards to Savile right up until he died and Charles led the tributes after his death in 2011 saying, how “saddened” he was… the Prince has not issued a statement about his sadness over the allegations…[...] 

(Source - infounderground.com)

Now surely Savile wasn’t teaching Big Ears how to be king? So what was he teaching him and once again, why were they such close friends. I cant imagine Big Ears getting on down to ‘Rock and Roll part 1′ by Gary Glitter, can you?

Perhaps the police will ask the future king why he was such good friends with a man who was particularly fond of fucking dead bodies?… Nahhh, they wont ask him either, will they?

Course, the Duck’s 2nd son Andrew, who is in fact more likely to be the son of Randy Lord Porchester (see my article Monsters Inc http://www.ccs-rochford.co.uk/spivey/?p=3786) also has paedophile tendencies. That is at least according to the excellent website Help Free the Earth:

Andrew, who 4th in line to the British throne, has been exposed in the news as a paedophile. His buddy, Jeffrey Epstein, is a convicted paedophile who served up underage girls to Prince Andrew like lolly pops.

Photos published in the British media show Andrew strolling in a park with Epstein — the New York billionaire jailed for soliciting child prostitutes in Florida. A photograph has also emerged showing Andrew with his arm around the waist of the child prostitute who is at the centre of that case. It has emerged that Andrew allegedly enjoyed massages at the Florida mansion where the Epstein child sexual abuse went on.

Epstein also gave Andrew $30,000 to help pay off his ex-wife Fergie’s massive debts that she was blackmailing him for. Andrew was finally forced to step down as Britain’s trade ambassador because of #1 – his criminal behaviour with underage girls. Two – a six million dollar tax evasion charge. Three – conflicts of interest from friendships with a convicted paedophile and with Libyan leader Gadafi’s son whose country was being bombed by the British military.

Do I need to carry on? No? I didn’t think so. But believe me I could… In fact I could go on and on and on. But all the other information I have will keep… For now.

However, as a foot note to this article, I will leave you with the following story that just about sum’s the Queens attitude up.

A few weeks ago, I was left a comment on an article about Jimmy Savile by a man calling himself Frank Jackson. I have since been in contact with Frank and now know his real identity.

In his comment, Frank had urged me to look into the background of two St John Ambulance men from New Zealand who are both in line to be decorated sometime this month, in honour of their service. New Zealand is of course owned by the current UK Monarch and as such, the honours that these two men are having bestowed on them by the Governor General have been sanctioned by the Queen.

The two men in question are Karl Berghan and Sam Brens. However, far from receiving top awards, sanctioned by our Queen, the pair of pond life should both be strung up by their bollocks. You see, Berghan and Brens are both prolific paedophiles who groomed Franks 14 year old daughter and persuaded her into having a regular threesome with them. Franks daughter was just one of 5 similar girls these two men, along with another man, laid their grubby little hands on.

However, that is only the beginning of what, had I not seen the proof, would have been a totally unbelievable story. That the Queen is unaware of these two monsters crimes just isn’t possible, as you will see once you read the full story.

Never the less, the award ceremony is still going ahead. Sadly, I cannot say that I am surprised since I am aware of the many, many people who have received awards sanctioned by the Queen and who have subsequently been convicted of crimes relating to child sex abuse.

You can read Franks horrific story and the devastating toll it has taken on his family – courtesy of the NZ government, Police, judiciary, and Social Services, all of whom are every bit as corrupt as ours – at the following link: http://bit.ly/ourNZexperience

So, that just leaves you to now enjoy the Daily Mails twisted take on a man they would have you believe, has selflessly devoted his life to Royal duty. If after reading the above, the article below doesn’t get your gag reflex going… You are either brain dead, or part of the problem.

Until the next time.

Much love,


Prince and the Pedophile: Charles’ connections to pedophilia networks
David Icke exposing Bilderberg and the truth about the Royal Family
Royal family enjoys veto power in all British govt. affairs
Queen and Prince Charles must be consulted before laws are passed
Covered-up: Prince Charles’ links to mass pedophile Jimmy Savile
UK Queen in hideout over pedophile Jimmy Savile; why?

Diana crash CCTV operator: footage ’rounded up & destroyed’

Source: http://www.ccs-rochford.co.uk/spivey/?p=6982


  1. Very interesting article! Praise be to those dedicated to exposing the truth, without you taking the time, risks and dedication with exposing these reptiles, humanity wouldn’t stand a chance.

  2. How dare you. You fucking Cretin. Prince Phillip served this country with distinction in WWII. He was awarded the Greek War Cross of Valour for his services in the Mediterranean and saved his ship and crew from a bomber attack. You should be disgusted with yourself for this cowardly, pathetic and incredibly ill informed nonsense. It’s people like you that ruin this country.

    • Thank you for posting this. The world is due for this type of wake-up call. Prince Phillip and the gangsters of the ‘royal’ family should pay the price for what they’ve done.

    • As for Lee, i’m sure you’re a fan of ignorance and bias, so continue to live as you live and spread the cancer of impotence around you. People make me laugh when they try to fight the truth and facts with insults instead of reasoning, why even bother?

    • Jason Dalton-Earls

      If you read it you stupid biggot it is most obviously true. It’s people like you who keep their heads in the sand that allow this amoral behavior to occur!! DAMN PEDO SUPPORTER&RACIST EUGENICS SUPPORTER. GO FIND A KIDDIE BROTHEL YOU INBRED NAZI SUPPORTER!!!

    • You are not getting it are you?

    • and its fools like you who make it possible for pedophiles like him to get away with what they do. youre the type whod probably just give the old pervert your grandchildren for him to bugger youre such a slave and servant to their lies.

    • Hey lee………go screw the old buzzard if you are so in love with him. Who gives a rat’s ass if he served his country. Serving your country does not give ANYONE A FREE PASS to abuse others. What thehell does serving your country have to do with this article?
      It is people like yourself who allow this crap to go on.
      PHUKK the people who are called royalty. PHUKK them all.

    • No its brainwashed people like you.

    • You, sir, are the uninformed one if you believe any of that things that you just wrote.

    • are u a drongo or something: dickhead.
      Wake the fuck up imbecile.

  3. It’s entirely unfair to ridicule a man who obviously hasn’t shed a tear since being brutally raped as an infant, even if he is one of the slimiest of scum.

  4. Fantastic article – beautifully written and a fresh insight into the Royal Family from a particularly jaded and acerbic stance. So Chris, now that you have decimated the Royals for their lack of everything – what precisely have you achieved with your life that we may admire the force behind the words… Armed forces perhaps…? Do tell. All I can image from the above is that you might possibly be a little ineffectual twerp in a bedsit in Battersea, nightly masturbating over a photo of Oswald Mosley… Your audience awaits…

  5. No comment on Philip, but the holocaust never took place. Why are you so protective of Jews? See






    Arbeit Macht Frei (Work makes you free)

    Then, to see what the Zionists continue to do as the Synagogue of Satan they are, see:



    Then to read about the real holocaust, read:

    Not a single Jew died in a gas chamber-video 5:48:

    And this that is not in my e-zine either:

    Taken from http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/06/johan-galtung-on-jews/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+theoccidentalobserver%2Ffeed+%28The+Occidental+Observer%29
    1. Sir Winston Londonstan
    2. June 14, 2012 – 9:37 am | Permalink
    3. 2@Hedgerow: Interesting but to me these numbers obscures the geopolitical game .The US Fed’s owners are playing the world . Thus China has to be kept in bondage , not debt bondage but more importantly resource bondage .They can get by without American markets and can steal the technology they need and at the moment they are at the low end of the industrialization curve so that’s is more sauce than steak , but without the oil and ore , there is nowhere to go . Thus we have Afghanistan and Libya .The Chinese could strengthen their currency and cheapen the cost of imports and sell the difference internally but they need to keep the West hooked on cheap imports to have a strong bargaining position so they accept Jewish ‘paper’ without much chance of commoditizing it (in my opinion ) . This is a great game dance .This is partly the reason why controlling Iran is so important (the excuse the Jonkeys are given at any rate ) .
But China is communist and who set up communism ? Jews . I have seen a picture of Hu Jintu (or the last one) meeting a founding Jewish communist of the China’s Party in the US in the 2000′s so their [sic] might well be a geopolitical understanding between the top echelons of both organizations . The US is far more politically sympathetic towards China that [sic-should be than]Russia , that is the MSM , and who controls that ? Russia is Christian and white . See the hostility .
It seems to me that the Jews want to carve up the world with the Asians in one block headed by the Chinese and the West headed by Jews centered in Jew-city . Immigration is designed to break European Peoples hold on our countries . I see the MSM is starting to beatup the White-Supremists evil people (the evil N**zi’s is played out for the time being) . Lots of close up of skin head football players etc ; images filled with subliminals too I’ll bet . Divide and Rule the old game .
As I said on SnowWhite movie review ; Whites are being gulled by these movies while the floor is cut away from underneath us with massive immigration unabated .Our enemies are running for the line now , and the goy’s masses have to be kept reassured until it too late . Then ofcourse Jews will say , yeh of course it was a holyhoax , you goy’s are so stupid you’ll believe any nonsense we shove under your nose .
    Also see 2009 in this link that is about 90% of the way down in it:

    And this from Publisher Arthur Topham:

    And this from a Greek who knows:


    • I’m sure you’d have got top marks in the Hitler Jugend Rassenlehr Prufung (look it up you ignorant bitch).
      Your drivel about Russia and China is barely coherent (as well as being clearly gleaned from some half-bit anti-semitic right wing conspiracy theory page).
      And as for the Jews inventing Communism… Marx and Engels were both brought up Lutheran, Lenin was brought up in the Russian Orthodox faith, was ethnically Tatar (descendants of the Golden Horde Mongols) and was a staunch atheist all of his adult life.
      The only Jewish figure to achieve worldwide prominence was Trotsky and his impact was limited to the pre-revolutionary period and the civil war.
      The nonsense you chose to spout here is utter propaganda: devoid of facts or background and suffused with paranoia and Jingoism.
      The millions who died in the camps (not just Jews but Romanies, Poles, Trade Unionists, Political activists, Jehovah’s witnesses, Catholics and other supposed ‘undesirables’ deserve more than to be belittled by your poorly written and utterly groundless garbage.

      Visit Auschwitz-Birkenau, you might learn something.

    • Well how comes some of my family members had to scarper to the UK? And how comes my friends all lost family members? They must have imagined it.

      • Smedley Butler Jr.

        BTW, who gave the Rothschilds their start? Was it not European royalty? The Rothschilds and company were and probably still are hofjuden – court Jews in service to the royals. Sorry, the Rothschilds did not take over England by some clever stock market chicanery. Do you really believe that King George lll, with armies and assassins at his command, said, “Damn, those Jewish bankers are just too darn clever for us. Oh well, I guess we’ll have to give up our power.” Are you mad?

    • Smedley Butler Jr.

      I knew a women as a child who was in one of Hitler’s death camp. She had a numbered tattoo on her wrist. You are a neo-Nazi piece of trash.

      It is slime balls like yourself that insure that the international mafia known as the New World Order will be victorious. You see, all people are corruptible, not just Jews. By turning the patriot/anti-NWO/9/11 Truth movements into neo-Nazi movements, you are helping to insure that the truth movement is forever relegated to a fringe, neo-Nazi movement that will NEVER gain mass appeal. In other words, you are a freaking tool, like your buddy Hal Turner (didn’t he turn out to be an FBI informant?).

    • Smedley Butler Jr.

      Finally, guess what Heinrich? If every single Jew was somehow transported to another planet, not ONE thing would change. Not one thing. That is because ALL people are corruptible and flawed. Period. Even if Zionist Jews are indeed at the top of the NWO pyramid, if they were all disappeared in one evening, every vile “goy” below them would fill their positions in a heartbeat.

  6. There’s some interesting stuff here but it could do with some severe editing. Bill Maloney is clearly not a reliable source. There’s no good evidence that ‘Eddy’ Duke of Clarence outlived his official death although I concede the point about the Bowes Lyon sisters. Princess Diana is hardly a reliable source either. You can see Sally Bedell Smith’s biography for info on what a troubled and contradictory character she was.

    It’s right that Philip’s sisters all married Nazis. But he fought on the British side in WW2. Yes, the British royal family has Nazi connections and even Nazi members but Philip’s mother kept a Jewish family hidden from the Nazis in her palace in Athens. You rightly condemn the Windsors and Bowes-Lyons for hiding away their relatives with learning difficulties and epilepsy, but sneer at them for having haemophilia and the like. Let’s have some consistency!

    • Marianne, I’m trying really hard not to call you a dumb cow. I think I just might succeed in that struggle. Time will tell if I cab resist saying it –> based on any further shallow and ill-conceived analysis on your part.

      You seem to miss the point on so many fronts that you make me sympathize with those that have contempt for humanity. Here are a few points to consider:
      1) “prince Philip fought on the British side against the Nazis”
      Oh God! How stupid can you be? Having a bumbling loud mouthed idiot like Philip fighting on British side served the Nazi cause better than they could imagine. Just like his bungling cousin Mountbatten, who through his sheer incompetence managed to destroy at 2 British Capitol warships during the war.
      2) You brush past the scores and scores of British Royal Family Nazi supporters and bring up an anecdote that Prince Philip’s mother hid a Jewish family in her castle. Do you have attention deficit disorder or something akin to it? Did you miss the part where the author mentions that she had a fanatical religious obsession (Christianity) and thought she was Jesus Christ’s bride? Assuming the anecdote you provided isn’t a made up piece of revisionist war propaganda, Philip’s mother’s fixation with the Christian value and belief system would explain her actions vis a vis the Jewish family, NOT her being a Royal. Note that her behaviour was considered ABNORMAL by the rest of her family, they locked her up and condemned her for the rest of life. Which means she is not representative of their views and values. —An exercise in simple logic.

      3) you underplay the atrocious and Nazi-Eugenics like (and selfish) behaviour of the Royals towards those with mental retardation and epilepsy but couching it as “hiding away” people with learning disabilities. ARE YOU KIDDING ME? They didn’t just hide away the victims of their family’s greed and selfishness (victims created as a result of forced inbreeding to keep the family’s wealth and power under control), –>they bloody well threw them in the garbage and neglected them (who knows that they didn’t kill some of them, like David Cameron).

      4) you attack the author for “sneering” at the Royals for Haemophilia. The author has every right to sneer at them. You seem to be too daft to understand why, so let me hold you hand through this: the reason he sneers at them is BECAUSE the Royals act as if they are superior yet they are riddled with genetic diseases and defects PRECISELY BECAUSE OF THEIR CONTEMPT FOR THE REST OF HUMANITY AND BECAUSE OF THEIR GREED AND PARANOIA. The sneering is at a group of people who undeniably are genetically inferior to the vast majority of the human race, BECAUSE OF THEIR MORAL unfitness. The sneering is at them not their disease.

      Let’s have some co consistency MARIANNE!

    • he didn’t fight, every time the ship he was on went into battle, they would drop him off on land first and pick him up later, my uncle served on the same ship as him, he used to brag that he would be marrying the queen, cause it was all arranged from when they were small. No one liked him.

  7. Oh God, I didn’t notice the crazy Holocaust denial comment by Arlene Johnson above until I’d already commented! Introduce this woman to reality!

    • Oh God! You opinion is sooo important that the world would have stopped had you not shown the expected puffed-up righteous indignation in your belated comment.

  8. This article raises some interesting points, but I think it would be more effective without all of the ‘private eye-esque’ alteration of names…you don’t have to turn everything into a pun to convey your dislike. Also I take issue with the idea that all people who molest children do so out of choice: there is certainly condition, literal ‘paedophilia’ which I believe is genetically hardwired (like homosexuality) or is a result of trauma, particularly occurring during the individual’s childhood. This should be recognised as a mental condition and research done to understand it’s roots. The truly despicable are those who prey upon children simply because they are week and vulnerable.

  9. Hi, thanks for the great blog. Do you remember the story of the Queen’s butler who was found with the dead bodies of over 50 children on his land? And they found ‘evidence of blood drinking rituals’. I have since searched the internet and found – surprise surprise – that no trace of the story lingers. If you could find that story I would love you forever. People treat me like a crazy liar when I try to mention this story, people always want links to back up info, but what can you do when the Royals have blacked it all out. Find it!

  10. Renaissance Man, I don’t blame you for not prioritising finding out about Philip and his parents. No doubt, there are more important things in life. But I’m quite sure Philip fought for the British unlike his Nazi brothers-in-law, one of whom bombed London. See his wiki article. His mother, Alice of Battenberg the wife of Prince Andrew of Greece is honoured at Yad Vashem as a righteous gentile who saved one Jewish family from the Nazis. See her biography by Hugo Vickers and her wiki article.

    The stories put round about Prince Eddy by sensationalist Jack the Ripper enthusiasts are not consistent with each other, and cannot be considered reliable. See the biography of Prince Eddy by – I think – Andrew Crofts. I support disability rights and don’t think much of the eugenics movement. But the article was not consistent on this point. That’s true.

    I am indeed distressed by anti-Semitism and holocaust denial. I don’t see that there is anything self important, puffed up or self righteous about that. The facts I alluded to are all available in the public domain. I suggest you look them up.

    I can only speculate about why you are so unnecessarily angry, sarcastic and apparently full of hatred, let alone why it is directed at me as opposed to -say – Arlene the holocaust denier. Is it that you are also a holocaust denier? If so, you can’t be much concerned with empirical facts. But I don’t get the impression that you are.

    if you think I’m Philip’s greatest fan, you’re wrong. I’ve no time for him. But I am keen on fairness, truth and sensible debate. Are you the writer of this piece? If so, you needn’t get so angry. I was quite fair about it and said some nice things. But it could be improved.

    I can hardly believe such inoffensive comments as mine could set off such explosive and uncalled for responses. Chill out and get some perspective.

  11. Perhaps, I should add some clarifications without waiting for a reply. I really feel quite shaken by Renaissance Man’s attacks on me. I have just found a biography of Philip by Denis Judd which also mentions that he fought for the British in WW2. Will Renaissance Man take his word for it?

    Perhaps Renaissance Man thinks I am not concerned enough about royal and noble families treating their disabled members badly. This is not true. I think King George v and Queen Mary missed a great opportunity with Prince John. They could have demonstrated to their subjects that disability is nothing to be scared of. Instead, they were scared o him having an epileptic seizure in public. So they sent him away. It is a matter of controversy if they ever saw him again. But his brother the Prince of Wales wrote to his mistress to complain at having to go into mourning for John. He said he was glad he had died of epilepsy at thirteen. They had all been secretly praying for it for years. He was ‘more like an animal than anything else.’

    Similarly, the Bowes-Lyon sisters were put in an asylum. Their mother told Burkes’ Peerage that they were dead. This was a lie. No one visited them. One of their sisters married a Scandinavian prince. Bu they were paupers. All this is true. But Prince Eddy was not -repeat not an example of this. There is no evidence that he did not die in a flu epidemic as claimed.

    I criticised the views of a certain ‘Jac o’ the North’ online. He was appalled by the Paralympics. He was afraid that people might start fancying disable athletes, and that they would be able to breed. He seemed to think that they should be kept in nuclear bunkers to prevent this. Of course, amputees did not come home from WW1 and father children similarly maimed anyway. Acquired characteristics are not hereditary. I had the most awful reply from Jac, accusing me of being crazy for supporting disability rights. Now, Renaissance Man has an even more virulent go at me for -as he wrongly thinks- not doing that.Yes, it was foolish of European dynasties to become inbred. Should the people who suffered from haemophilia or porphyria be mocked? No. It was their parents’ fault, not theirs.And why accuse me of having ADD as if it was a crime, Renaissance Man? Where’s your consistency,eh?

    Edward viii was an awful racist. He sad Australian Aborigines were the lowest from of human life and the nearest thing to monkeys. In 1942, Prince Henry, Duke of Gloucester said that ‘this Hitler Johnny’ had the right idea about the ‘nosey brigade.’ George prevented Jews coming to Britain after Kristallnacht. Princess Margaret stormed out of a showing of ‘Schindler’s List’ because it showed Germans in a bad light and Jews in a sympathetic one. All this is true.

    The queen mother was also racist. So is Prince Philip. That does not alter the fact that he fought for Britain or that his mother is rightly remembered as a righteous gentile. The family did persecute Wallis Simpson. That does not alter the fact that Diana was manipulative and unreliable.

    I’ve seen enough of Jac o’ the North’s writings to suspect he is paranoid and intolerant, but I’m almost beginning to warm to him. I don’t know what Renaissance Man’s problem is but it’s serious. Will he believe now that I seriously don’t like Nazis and eugenicists or that I’m not a brown noser to royalty, or that I am even factually right about them?
    Alas, no. He will just see it as a self righteous huff puff of cosmic proportions. You cannot argue with determined malignancy.

    • Smedley Butler Jr.

      From the British Empire’s barbaric Imperialism (to the point of going to war with China twice for not wanting to buy the Brits’ opium) to the economic sanctions against Iraq in the 90′s that resulted in the death of half a million children (many due to starvation), the British Crown has proven time and time again that they are genocidal leeches who need to be dealt with in no uncertain terms.

      • The British government also put white South Africans in concentration camps during the Boer War. Many starved to death. In the 1870s they created an artificial famine in India, and again in Bengal in 1943. I’m one of the few people who believe the British government committed genocide in Ireland in the 1840s, although I came to this conclusion only after carefully examining primary sources. As I am a quarter Irish, I’m not impressed. I am not and never have been an apologist for the British government. But on none of these occasions was Britain an absolute monarchy. The monarchy may have some responsibility. It most certainly did not have sole responsibility. I don’t have any illusions about royalty. But let’s be fair. Let’s behave like grown ups.

  12. I do wish you had a paragraph function! When I said ‘disable athletes’ I meant ‘disabled athletes’. I meant to say that Prince John’s parents were scared ‘of’ him having an epileptic seizure in public, not ‘o’. I also meant that King George vi prevented Jewish refugees coming to the UK. That’s the present queen’s father, the one in ‘The King’s Speech.’

  13. One thing I forgot to address above was this: Perhaps Renaissance Man and others think that the biographers and reporters who say that Philip fought on the British side and that his mother hid her former Jewish governess and her family from the Nazis are lying. Well, governments and individuals do lie all the time of course. We’ve seen that the Bowes-Lyons lied about their relatives being dead. It might not even have been the first time they did it if ‘the Monster of Glamis’ story is to be believed. But you’d have to have very good evidence to challenge the accepted story. Otherwise, you’re just a conspiracy theorist. While some conspiracy theories may be true, it is likely that over 90 per cent of them are not. It’s a potentially dangerous mindset and can lead to ugly things like – well, holocaust denial. If that’s where you’re going, Renaissance Man, I hope that you and Arlene will be very happy together.

  14. My partner has just had a look at this. He thinks that Renaissance Man’s problem is that he really hates Prince Philip and he thinks I am an apologist for him. This is not true. As a keen student of history, I am interested in accurate facts. I am an apologist for neither Philip nor the monarchy. I’ve just read a book of Philip’s gaffes. He comes across as crude and insensitive to the point of cruelty, especially on the subject of the Dunblane massacre and smoke alarms. He also had the cheek to say that we should tax people for having children instead of giving them child benefit. He did not notice that he had himself fathered four children whom he expected tax payers to keep in luxury. He is thought to have bullied all his sons and would have done the same to Princess Anne, had she not stood up to him. He can indeed be seen in a crowd of Nazis at the funeral of his sister in Darmstadt after she and her family perished in a plane crash. He was then only a schoolboy. He transferred to a school in Scotland. He probably fought on the British side not because he was a hero but because there was no way he would get to marry the heir to the British throne if he fought on the other side. The Greek dynasty offered him to Princess Elizabeth when she was 18 and the war was still on. The wedding finally occurred in 1947. In spite of his exemplary war record, his mother-in-law still did not want him in the family. She called him ‘the Hun.’ The king’s objection was that he was crude and unlikely to be faithful. He’s an unlikeable man.I don’t feel hysterical about it, but he is. I would not want to meet him.

  15. One of the reasons Philip ought on the British side, is that he was urged to by his uncle, Louis ‘Dickie’ Mountbatten. There is no doubt about Mountbatten’s own courage as a naval commander. Unfortunately, he was also incompetent and reckless with the lives of his men.

    As the last viceroy of India, Mountbatten was a real villain. He deserted his post as the country was about to split into India and Pakistan with rioting, carnage and the greatest movement of peoples since -well -since forever. It was just so that he could attend the wedding of Prince Philip and Princess Elizabeth which he had engineered.

    In the years leading up to his assassination by the IRA, Mountbatten spun himself an heroic image -with the help of a wildly inaccurate TV series- which the public accepted at face value. A friend said, “Dickie, you’re so crooked, if you swallowed a nail, you’d shit a corkscrew.” Charles had a weakness for false gurus like the mystic and rapist, Laurens Van der Post. He also saw Mountbatten as a wise old sage. Mountbatten gave him advice on women and marriage which he followed. It was disastrous.

  16. I meat Philip fought on the British side.

  17. One thing I forgot to mention is Philip’s alleged ambition to come back as a deadly virus to sort out the world’s population problem. Perhaps we could just see a funny side in this. Of course, if he meant it seriously, he’s an eco-fascist. It doesn’t sound too good. It sounds as if he’s a cold person who doesn’t do intimacy. The one thing I find implausible in Denis Judd’s book is the claim that Philip had no sexual experience before marriage and has been faithful since. The former, especially, does not ring true. Philip’s name has been mentioned in connection with the Profumo scandal. Christine Keeler has mentioned some poor woman resorting to an illegal abortion after being impregnated by Philip in the early 60s. I’ve no idea if this is true. One writer has also alleged that Philip had an affair with the queen’s cousin Princess Alexandra. Of course, schmaltzy biographies of royalty can’t be taken entirely at face value. However, Philip’s service in the Royal Navy is a matter of public record. He kept it up in peace time until his wife became queen. There is a video on the internet of his attending the posthumous induction of his mother as a righteous gentile at Yad Vashem in Israel. He also made a speech. Do you think the Israeli government was complicit in a hoax? Why would they bother? His mother’s old governess was a Ruth Cohen. She can’t be still alive but her relatives may be available for comment.

  18. Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany was Queen Victoria’s eldest grandchild. If Britain had then had sex blind succession, he would have been Britain’s king. His mother Vicky was Victoria’s eldest child.
    That was one reason why he escaped trial for waging aggressive war after WWi. Queen Wilhelmina of the Netherlands gave him refuge. He was still there when the Nazis invaded in 1940.His second wife Hermine was a member of the Nazi party. After Kristallnacht, he is supposed to have said “For the first time I am ashamed to be a German.” But he has also been quoted as saying that Jews were pests to be eliminated, and the best method would be gas. I can’t confirm that he said either of these things.

  19. Queen Victoria rather callously plucked her small grandson Prince Charles Edward, Duke of Albany from Eton and sent him to Germany to become reigning duke in Coburg where her husband came from. He was known as Karl Edouard after that. Because he fought on the German side in WWi, he was stripped of his British titles after the armistice. Germany became a republic. He’d lost almost everything. He became a devoted Nazi and a friend of Hitler. He was used as a go between with his British relatives by Hitler. He is known to have been involved in the so-called euthanasia programme ie the elimination of those with perceived physical or mental problems. There were no Jews left in Coburg in 1945. I don’t know if he should take any blame for this. Ironically, his mother had always nagged him never to do anything that would make his late father ashamed. His father, Prince Leopold Duke of Albany had died of haemophilia and epilepsy before his birth. Queen Victoria had been ashamed of her son because of his illnesses and had initially treated him with some dislike. She then became overprotective. Very unusually for a Victorian person, Leopold was into disability rights. He was particularly concerned with the rights of deaf people. He would have been ashamed of his Nazi son. He would have been very bitterly ashamed. Karl was imprisoned by the Americans and brought before a denazification court. He was finally released. He was not invited to the coronation of the present queen. He watched it in a cinema. The queen has often been to Germany but has studiously boycotted Coburg. Karl’s sister Alice who remained in Britain was popular with the British public up to her death in 1981. The facts about her brother were kept under wraps until recently.

  20. Karl of Coburg was ordered by his Nazi masters to win over Edward viii and his brother George Duke of Kent for the cause of the master race. Did he succeed? It is difficult to get any accurate information on Prince George Duke of Kent. His family obviously find him an embarrassment and don’t want to discuss him. This might just be because he was a promiscuous bisexual drug addict, but historians have surmised that he was a Nazi on the quiet. He was keen on the company of his Nazi relatives in Germany. When Rudolf Hess made his solo flight to Scotland in 1941, he said he had come to see ‘the duke.’ This was taken to mean the Duke of Hamilton, but there has been speculation that he really meant the Duke of Kent. Prince George Duke of Kent was killed in a plane crash during a military operation in Scotland in 1942. The details have never been made public. It has been seriously suggested that Winston Churchill arranged the accident because Kent was a liability if not a traitor. But a recent Channel 4 programme ‘The Queen’s Uncle’ thought it could clear up the mystery, Kent had been a British agent all the time. He had insisted that this be put in writing in order that his name be cleared for posterity. He had only infiltrated Nazi circles at the behest of the British government. He probably had been the catalyst for Rudolf Hess’s bizarre flight to Scotland, but only inadvertently. It had all been a misunderstanding.

  21. Edward viii, later the Duke of Winsor, was exceptionally racist even for his time. Was he also a Nazi? A book ‘The Traitor King’ alleges that he gave British military secrets to the Germans during WW2. It’s also been said that he was complicit in a plot by Nazi agents in Portugal to put him back on the throne as a puppet king after a successful German invasion of the UK. If he had been anyone but an ex-king, he would have been hanged after the war.

    For some years, I was inclined to accept this. My attitude to Edward viii was naturally one of utter contempt. But then, out of the blue, I saw a Guardian article in which the writer of ‘The Traitor King’ dolefully admitted that he had been bamboozled by forged documents. He admitted that he had been deceived and he did not even know by whom. His humility and maturity in accepting facts that disproved what he wanted to believe are an example to us all!
    It’s undoubtedly true that the Duke and Duchess of Windsor toured Nazi Germany in 1937. How much can be read into that?

  22. There have been some bizarre and contradictory stories about Wallis Simpson, later the Duchess of Windsor. She was a man. She was a hermaphrodite. She was a lifelong virgin who had never been touched ‘south of the Mason-Dixon line.’ She had had an illegal abortion which rendered her sterile. She had worked in a brothel in Shanghai. She was a Nazi spy and the mistress of the Nazi Ribbentrop who was hanged after Nuremberg. They can’t all be true, and it’s unlikely that any of them were. It is said that some of these stories were contained in the mysterious ‘China dossier’ compiled in the 30s. Who was the source of these stories? It’s likely it was the queen mother and that she also smeared Edward viii. There’s some evidence that behind the queen mother’s sugary flirtatiousness was a hard woman. Diana was right for once when she said she had ‘few feelings.’ Georgia Campbell thought she effectively deposed Edward viii and made herself queen. Would that technically make her a traitor?

  23. If the queen mother did indeed put round sexual smears about Wallis Simpson, perhaps it serves her right that Bill Maloney has spread the story that she herself went to Haute de la Garenne to abuse little girls-not something that any of us would want to visualise. But he has produced no evidence. When I say that he is not reliable, I don’t mean it in any unkind spirit. He says that he and his siblings were abused in a home. This may very well be true. My sympathy is with him.

    But when he was going round Jersey, interpreting the presence of ornaments in people’s gardens and front windows as evidence of child abuse and even witchcraft, it was obvious that the impact of his suffering has interfered with his ability to assess evidence objectively. I could give more examples but that it not necessary.

  24. If any royal people in Britain today are guilty of child abuse, we can be pretty sure that it will not come out in their lifetimes. I’m not saying they are, just that if they were, they would be protected.

    Have any royal people been guilty of child abuse in the past? My God, yes! Some historians mention that Queen Victoria’s uncle, later William iv became a rapist at 13, and had sexual relations with girls of 14 or so. The latter was then legal. This is not something that his biographers tend to mention at all. His brother,Ernest, Duke of Cumberland and later King of Hanover, was a rapist, and committed ‘every crime except suicide.’ Until the late 1700s, the British royal family had not only arranged marriages but child marriages. Before about 1680. it would be easier to make a list of those kings and princes who were not child abusers by today’s standards than those who were. Of course, different times have different standards. They didn’t think they were doing anything wrong. In some cases, child marriages might not have been consummated immediately, but it’s obvious that they often were.

  25. In 1985, the biographer of the royal doctor, Lord Dawson of Penn, published a startling fact. Penn had murdered George v in 1936. He had done this with the approval of Queen Mary. The king was dying anyway. If he died after midnight, his death would be announced in the vulgar evening papers. The doctor gave the king a lethal injection at 11.55 pm so that the news would make the headlines of the morning papers which had more gravitas. It’s fair to say that Queen Mary had her priorities wrong. It’s been plausibly suggested that she too was put down by her doctors, at her own request in 1953, so that court mourning would not interfere with the coronation of her granddaughter, the present queen.

  26. Perhaps, some of us would feel a pang of sentimental sorrow if the monarchy was abolished, but there’s no good reason to keep it except that some people like it. If you were starting a government again from scratch, you wouldn’t have a monarchy. I’ve not heard any good arguments for it. it’s not a bulwark against dictatorship although, for historical reasons, it may seem that way in Spain. Monarchies were invaded by our tiresome old enemies, the Nazis in the 40s. The Dutch queen, for instance, fled to the UK and let them get on with it. King Alexander of Yugoslavia, who was assassinated in Marsailles in the 1930s, had declared himself a dictator. Geoffrey Robertson thinks that Hirohito was an awful old tyrant who was personally responsible for Japanese aggression in the 30s and 40s although this was covered up. one argument is “I wouldn’t want to do her job” or “I wouldn’t want to do his job.” It’s a weird kind of pro-monarchy argument. The obvious response is “If it’s such an awful job, abolish it.” A more serious point is incomes from the Duchy of Cornwall and the like. they could go to more worthy causes.

  27. There are some good arguments for republicanism. One is that monarchy and class distinction are an assault on the dignity of humanity. We should all be equal. The monarchy is also an awful waste of tax payers’ money.

    There are also bad arguments. One is that Prince Philip is a shape shifting lizard.

  28. An argumentative acquaintance had heard vaguely of the abdication crisis of 1936. He had the impression that it was Edward viii himself who had been divorced. He argued that all the queen’s children who had been divorced should be stripped of their rights of succession. They don’t deserve their privileges but they shouldn’t be stripped of them for that reason. There had been divorced kings and queens before Edward viii. But for a few decades the family did abominate divorce and gave their divorced relatives a hard time. The queen made an intemperate speech on the subject decades ago that was widely criticised. In stigmatising divorce, royalty did a great disservice to the people. Who’s to say how many people forced themselves to stay in unhappy marriages and became victims of domestic abuse and murder as a result? It was only the awfulness of Diana and Charles’ marriage that jolted the queen into accepting that divorce is sometimes essential. Until extremely recently too, the royal family has had great big televised weddings using the ceremony from the 1662 prayer book. This required grovelly and debasing vows from both parties. It’s not a very dignified view of marriage that they were selling to us.

  29. You can see why Mohammed al Fayed wants to believe that Philip murdered his son. He naturally doesn’t want to blame himself for employing an incompetent driver. In assessing how truthful Al Fayed is, check out Tom Bowyer’s book on this corrupt tycoon who came across as ‘friendly and evil at the same time.’ I’m not saying that the royal family or the secret services might not be bad enough to arrange a fatal crash but the evidence that they did so is lousy. Could they force Diana not to wear a seat belt? It was very naughty of Noel Botham to write a book claiming she was murdered. Perhaps she really did predict that Charles -not Philip-would arrange an accident with her car. Even taking into account Diana’s emotional problems and eating disorders, it seems unfair and discriminatory to dismiss her alleged words out of hand, considering that she did in act die after a car crash. There was, though, a book published in 1996 to coincide with the divorce, called ‘Diana on the Edge.’ In this, disenchanted therapists predicted what post divorce life would hold for Diana. Almost unbelievably, some of them said that she might well be dead in a year’s time! They even suggested that she would die in a car crash. But they did not expect this to happen as a result o foul play but because of her own recklessness. She had already been in a few crashes.

  30. Oh no, this post is up again after once being removed, so anyone in the world can see that poor godforsaken muppet, ironically self identified as ‘Renaissance Man’ giving me a load of crazy abuse for my mild and factually correct remarks which were much kinder than this stupid site deserves! And I’d been so grateful to Google for removing it. I particularly resent this crazy abuse for saying something nice about the Duke of Edinburgh whom I don’t like at all. I was just trying to be fair to him on principle.

    I was trying to be nice to the site master in my original comment. Like a tactful teacher when presented with work which is objectively rubbish, I was trying to find some nice things to say along with constructive criticism. I wish I hadn’t said anything now. The fact is the whole premise of this site is false. Philip had Nazi connections. This was not his fault. He was only a boy. He fought for the British. Therefore, to call him the sickest man in Britain for wiping away a tear at the cenotaph or wherever is uncalled for. These were his old colleagues.

  31. Furthermore, the ironically named ‘Renaissance Man’ shouts at me in capitals that Philip and royalty in general don’t care about anyone. But when Philip shows that he does care by wiping away a tear, this is interpreted as sick hypocrisy. If I show a sensitive side by getting upset about Arlene the appalling holocaust denier, I get a load of abuse for that. As ‘Renaissance Man’ doesn’t have a problem with holocaust deniers and indirectly defends them, what evidence is this that he cares about anyone? In fact, if he supports holocaust deniers, why would he have a problem with Philip being a Nazi even if he really was one? It doesn’t make any sense.

  32. Is there anything I can do to get this awful site taken down? It’s not enough that it’s libellous crap, that’s for sure. After all there’s a video up claiming that Diana was murdered by her body guard Trevor Rees Jones. There are several that say there is a concentration camp under Denver International Airport. I’d recommend them for a really good laugh.

  33. Ok, it’s time to ditch my polite ladylike prose and my ‘more in sorrow than in anger’ approach to ‘Renaissance Man.’ Perhaps that will get Google to remove it. Renaissance Man,you’re not a renaissance man. You wouldn’t recognise a painting by Rafael if it came up and offered you a large gin and tonic. You’re an ignorant twat, a stupid fucker and a cunt. When you die, you’ll suck your mother’s coccyx in hell for all eternity while being anally raped by a camel wearing an African hedgehog as a condom. But you should be fucking Geoffrey of Monmouth in hell. You’re both pseudo-historians. You don’t know your arse from a hole in the ground. And Arlene, you racist bitch, you should be gassed.

  34. Oh shit, maybe the above looks like a threat which would be actionable as well as unpleasant. That’s not how it’s meant of course. I don’t know who Renaissance Man is, and I suppose Arlene really is Arlene but I don’t know where she is in the world and have no interest in pursuing her.

  35. On reflection, I was sinking to her level by saying Arlene should be gassed. It was just an off the cuff remark which I didn’t mean on a deep level although I am not interested in her welfare either. As Arlene has not had a go at me personally, maybe I should leave her out of this. What I should have said is, Renaissance Man, you fucking stupid dipstick, fuck off and die. I hope this clarifies matters and will not affect my standing with the liberal intelligentsia.

  36. Very interesting – but consider this – take a look at pics of Mountbatten when he was younger and then Charles at the same age. They look like father and son. Wills looks like Juan Carlos who reputedly shagged Diana. Lizzy’s first child was born at home. Ba’al worshipers sacrifice their first born.

    The latest publicity pic of the royals and George show a child supposedly around 9mths old – who looks more like 12-13mths. Given that April 20th is Adolph’s birthday, my pick is that the child who left the hospital was already some 3mths or so old and the 7mth old fetus being carried by Kate was the subject of the September equinox celebrations in Scotland, where they disappeared to after the “birth”.

    Note too the Prince attended the world leading invitro-fertilization (and cloning?) clinic in Wellington – started by a leading British scientist in the late 1980′s, while there for his 64th birthday bash, an event which was so loaded with symbols it was mind-numbing, as well as at least (potentially) three human sacrifices.

    Tomorrow, the 4:7:14 William and Kate are here in NZ. They are in Christchurch on the 4:14:14 and leave on the country on the 16th. 4+7+1+4=16 or 7. 4+1+4+1+4=14 or 7+7, 1+6+4+1+4=16 or 7. Someone worked this out well. The 16th is also a full moon.

    With Israel being given a deadline of the 4:14:14 by America over Palestine, and it being the eve of Passover, and the Israelis having withdrawn all its consular staff worldwide for 103 facilities, all of them probably booby-trapped with Nukes and or Bio-weapons, set up to create their own final solution, it is not looking good. There is a Royal bolthole already established here near the city of Hamilton – many of the Royals and mammon aristocracy (or arsetoxicry) have homes here.

  37. Oh, Ian, you’re being imaginative and I give you credit for that . But you’ve really let your imagination run away with you. Romans and other people including the writers of the Old Testament claimed Baal worshippers sacrificed their first born. It may well be true. There are tophets galore but we’re not sure they’re not just child cemeteries. A woman historian with a Greek surname, Francesca Something claims the worshippers of Yahweh sacrificed their children as well although they claimed they didn’t.

    But what has this to do with the British Royal Family today? There is some evidence that child sacrifice continued quietly up to 1843 in Germany. At least, this has been claimed in books on historical child abuse. But, even considering that the British Royal Family is of German descent, I know of no evidence that they have been involved in this.

    Perhaps Prince William looks like Juan Carlos. Diana has been suspected of having an affair with the Spanish king. I suspect she did but only after William’s birth. Both Juan Carlos and William are descended from Queen Victoria so why shouldn’t they have a family a resemblance? Mountbatten was Charles’ great uncle and Philip’s uncle. So you can expect them to look alike. It’s not sinister.

    I don’t understand this stuff about numerology or Kabbala. You obviously think it’s valid. I can’t say I do. Don’t fall for David Icke’s nonsense. I know he was right about Savile, but his stuff about reptilians is the stuff of fairy tales.

    The Royals are just ordinary people in extraordinary circumstances. The older generation are said to be rude and charmless. They don’t deserve their privileges. They may even exercise improper influence on government and events. The queen is able to behave undemocratically in the Privy Council. This should not be happening.

    But the Black Arts are not involved. There’s no mystery about a woman having a baby. We all know how babies are made. There’s nothing wizardly, baroque or supernatural about it. The paranormal does not exist.

    Please don’t lose any sleep about this. Philip went to a horrible Scottish boarding school. He did not go to Hogwarts. We can sleep safely in our beds as far as he’s concerned.

  38. Oh damn, I forgot about the lack of a paragraph function. My last post would have been hard to read and artificially boring. And I also forgot my most important point. It is this. There are enough real things to worry about in life. Let’s not frighten ourselves with imaginary threats as well. Cheers.

  39. Marriane, human sacrifice is still practiced today – whether it be war, abortion, or any other deliberate act of destruction, it is sacrifice by any definition. And the sacrificing of children to Molloch or to Ba’al was prevalent, especially the first child and harks back to Cain sacrifice of his brother Able – just like Juan Carlos sacrificed his own brother by “accidentally” shooting him in the head. As for the reptile thing, that is easy. The Hebrew word for strength is kowach, which means like a chameleon of a large lizard in a dry place – to wit adaptive strength. We all have a reptilian sub-brain, and some are better at being vipers and snakes than others, or as Jesus said, you are of your father, the serpent of old. Your claim that they are ordinary people is true by virtue of their ordinariness, but that is where it ends – for they do not see themselves as being “ordinary” – only a royalist would come up with that rot. I see by your conversation that you do not comprehend that there are indeed people who live by Astrology and Druidism, such as the Royals, and that their astrologers determine the dates of their “event-full” lives. That you are closed to the paranormal does not mean that it does not exist, it simply means that you have not been exposed to it in such a way that you become a believer. Once you meet the devil or the Lord, and I have met both, you stop being a nay-sayer. I pray that God will open your eyes. These Masonic muppets always do things by the numbers, and to those of us who sniff them out, the piss marks they leave on the posts are all too evident…

  40. Ian , I accept that evolution happened so I naturally don’t believe that Cain killed Abel or that either of then existed. Of course people make a living by astrology. I once wrote an astrology column myself but I just made it up as I went along. I don’t believe in astrology.

    The one thing where I really agree with you is that tragically, child sacrifice does still exist in some parts of the world but that’s no evidence that the monarchy is involved. Thank you for praying for me but if I shared your beliefs, I’d be upset all the time, and I’m anxious enough as it is. I feel almost anguished that you are distressing yourself unnecessarily in my view. I hope you are not as unhappy as I suspect you are.

    If I’ve got it wrong and your beliefs make you happy, I wouldn’t want to deprive you of that. But I don’t think I’m likely to come to share them because most of them are unsupported by evidence. Try to comfort yourself like this: If there are people who try to do evil by supernatural means, they won’t succeed. I think it can’t happen because I don’t believe in the supernatural. But if you believe in God, do you think God would allow it? Weren’t the people who believed in witches guilty of heresy? It suggests that Satan – a fictional character in my opinion – is as powerful as God. As I type this, a historian on ‘This Week’ s saying that the queen is now 88. The monarchy is fragile. It might not survive her. So even if the monarchy is what you think, perhaps it’s on its last legs. The Bible is not my favourite book, but it says a few sensible things. One is ‘Don’t let yourself be troubled’. That’s my humble advice to you.

    • You sound very like my Marxist sister. She says that she only believes in what is observable and provable. So I suggested that she contemplate the fact that all matter is made of light energy, and solid matter is literally, light “slowered” down to below the speed of light. An average human body potentially has about 20,000 watts of energy locked up in it and 50 trillion or so individual cells all in harmony, barring cancer. This alone is a miracle, let alone the observable Universe. I used to be an erudite atheist, until on day I encountered Love in a personal way that so contradicted my own pride that it humbled me, and persuaded me that there is so much more that we do not see, yet see the evidence of, for the invisible attributes of God are made visible by and in His Creation. And by the way, the Aramaic scriptures refer to the periods of creation as “eons of time, being of indeterminate length”. The Catholics concocted their version of Creation and other lies such as hell to keep their superstitious, fear bound and ruled people in line. Now I know you disavow the supernatural and even paranormal, but let me recount a true tale. My atheist sister has a life-style estate. I had prayed for a sign for her, and one day while visiting her, found her in a paddock with 3 mini mobs each of 6 sheep which had escaped from the adjacent paddock, and she was beside herself trying to get the to go back. When she gave up trying, I asked her to stand at a particular place and not to move, and then told my other sister to stand point too, while I wandered up to what seemed to me to be the lead ewe, and told her what to do without saying a word, and she went and did it while the others followed her lead. When my sister closed the gate on them, she looked at me in wonder and said, “How the hell did you do that?” I replied, “Lynn, even YOUR sheep hear MY voice…” LOL…

  41. Well, I don’t espouse Marxism which seems to me like a secular religion. I mean dogmatic Marxism of course. I am quite keen on Socialism. But I agree with you sister about the importance of empirical evidence. I’m relieved you don’t believe in Hell as it would be horrible to think you might be in danger of going there. I’ve only just found out that adults, running an after school club, have been telling my children that they were in danger of going to Hell. I was not very happy about this. But my sons are very good at reasoning, and they saw the flaws in the adults’ arguments at once. I’m intrigued about why you turned your back on atheism. Doesn’t evolution by natural selection adequately explain how our bodies are composed?

    • Darwinism is itself a religion which requires faith to believe in a random chance encounters of physical Universe mad of light energy can and do result in life spontaneously occurring, while rather overlooking how everything came into being in the first instance. Where you have arguments and suppositions, I have real life experiences – hence my sister could not get how i communicated with her sheep without any utterance.

      The real danger of Darwinism is that it promotes the concept of “natural selection” as opposed to divine election. This was seized upon by Eugenicists from Margaret Sanger to Adolph Hitler, as well, I suspect, by Bill Gates’ father and probably him too. Darwinism excuses pathological psychopathic behavior based upon the premise of survival of the fittest and the fastest, or should I say swiftest. Higher considerations come from a higher self, otherwise they are merely enlightened self-interest predicated upon a survival instinct, to wit, the so-called selfish gene. Selfishness is survival, selflessness is Spirit.

      • “The paranormal doesn’t exist”; “I don’t believe in the paranormal”; “I just made it up as I went along”; “I know of no evidence that they have been involved in this.”

        Marianne please (he began patronisingly), first off, way to boost your own credibility – I just made it up = I made my living as a professional liar.
        Secondly, back to that old consistency chestnut, is evidence of any kind of importance at all? First you boldly and baldly assert that [insert noun of choice, could be anything, e.g. the paranormal] does not exist, then you qualify that by attempting to justify your assertion by proposing that it does not exist {because?} you don’t believe in it.
        You then go on to refer to the importance of evidence as if you can “win” your argument that way after having categorically denied the “paranormal”. Is it comforting to be so narrow minded as to be certain that what you have yet to experience does not exist?
        Let’s see if you can address this question without going on and on and on about it:
        Your position is that the paranormal/anything that you haven’t experienced (have you been to Singapore? If not, does that exist?) does not exist, and we should find your endless diatribe convincing because it is based on sound evidence such as the fact that you can present the following evidence that the paranormal does not exist . . . . .

        Take it away Marianne: “I have evidence that “the paranormal” does not exist which consists of . . . . . . .

  42. Seriously hope the royals get what’s coming to them there’s nothing great about a single one of them

    • If what goes round comes round and if it is all about Karmic retribution, then where does that leave us all? Is the shit that happens, and happened, to me rationalised as Karmic consequences? Why then do “good” things happen to evil bastards and vice versa? Time and chance (aka; shit) happens to all. Ecclesiastes 9/11. The fundamental problem we all face has not changed since the fall – that of playing at being gods, knowing (judging) good and evil. If you wish it upon others that they may “get theirs” then remember, there is a reciprocal at work and you better make sure that if you are going to live as under the Law, that you become a debtor to do the whole Law. Besides, Liz cannot help herself, she is probably possessed of the spirit of Jezebel, the Black Widow with the white Queen visage…how can someone who is possessed be held responsible for their actions? In her own way, she too is a victim, and she plays that part very well too…

  43. What surprises me is that even though lots of women and lots of people damn pedophilia, less do the same when the actors are loyal and rich.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>