Newtown school shooting story already being changed by the media to eliminate eyewitness reports of a second shooter

The national media is ablaze today with coverage of the tragic elementary school shooting in Newtown, CT, where 27 people have reportedly been killed, including 18 children.

As always, when violent shootings take place, honest journalists are forced to ask the question: “Does this fit the pattern of other staged shootings?”

One of the most important red flags of a staged shooting is a second gunman, indicating the shooting was coordinated and planned. There are often mind control elements at work in many of these shootings. The Aurora “Batman” shooter James Holmes, for example, was a graduate student actually working on mind control technologies funded by the U.S. government. There were also chemical mind control elements linked to Jared Lee Loughner, the shooter of Congresswomen Giffords in Arizona in 2011.

According to multiple eyewitness reports from Aurora, Colorado, including at least one caught on camera by mainstream media news reports in Colorado, James Holmes did not operate alone. There was a second shooter involved. But the media quickly eliminated any mention of a second shooter from its coverage, resorting to the typical cover story of a “lone gunman.”

Today, the exact same thing is happening with the Newton, CT school shooting.

Newtown shooting

Eyewitness reports of a second shooter now being “scrubbed” from the news

As the story of this shooting was first breaking, the news was reporting a second gunman.

FoxNews reported that this second gunman was “led out of the woods by officers” and then questioned. The original source of this report was the Connecticut Post.

A local CBS affiliate was also reporting the existence of a second gunman and said “Police believe there may be a second gunman and are looking for a red or maroon van with its back window blown out…”

ABC News also originally reported, “A second gunman is apparently at large. Car-to-car searches are underway.”

A local CT CBS affiliate was also reporting, “CBS News reports that a potential second shooter is in custody and that SWAT is now investigating the home of the suspect. A witness tells WFSB-TV that a second man was taken out of the woods in handcuffs wearing a black jacket and camouflage pants and telling parents on the scene, ‘I did not do it.'”

But the more recent stories being put out by the media are scrubbing any mention of a second gunman and going with the “lone gunman” explanation, which holds about as much water as the “lone gunman” explanation of the JFK assassination.

“A lone gunman killed 27 people at an elementary school here, including 18 children, in a terrifying early Friday morning shooting spree,” reports USA Today. It makes no mention whatsoever of a second gunman.

NBC News is also now chiming in with the “lone gunman” version of the story, eliminating any mention of a second gunman from its coverage of the tragic event.

Another story authored by NBC News carries the title, “26 dead after lone gunman assaults Connecticut elementary school.” Once again, no mention of a second gunman as reported by eyewitnesses.

When key elements of the story keeps changing, something is fishy

Journalists are trained to ask questions, and one of the questions I have right now is: Why was the second gunman suddenly dropped from media coverage after the first few hours of this story developing?

And why is there always a second gunman in these recent mass shootings that seem to be engineered to maximize emotional shock value due to the sheer horror of all the innocent deaths?

This story is continuing to develop, and we’ll keep asking questions here on Natural News. Our hearts and prayers go out to the children and families impacted by this violent tragedy. Given the terrible loss of life that has taken place here, shouldn’t we all seek to get to the bottom of WHY these shootings all seem to fit a common pattern of multiple mind-controlled shooters followed by an almost immediate media cover-up of the facts?

For the sake of those children who were killed today, I want to get to the bottom of this and expose the REAL story, for the purpose of stopping this violence from targeting yet more innocents in the future.

How they can brainwash you in a psych ward
Inmate: James Holmes told me he was ‘programmed’ to kill by “evil” therapist
Dave Mustaine (Megadeth frontman and Ex-Metallica): Obama staged recent massacres to ban guns
BREAKING: 4 man team carried out Sikh massacre says eyewitness!
Batman Denver shooting eyewitness: “From what we saw he wasn’t alone, he had someone with him…”

connecticut school shooting


Check Also

Unexpoded bombs in Laos

The most heavily bombed country on Earth

Editor’s note: Unknown to most Laos is the most heavily bombed country on earth per ...


  1. Urgent Breaking News!

    Journalists Give FBI Links To Cyber-criminals Defaming Sandy Hook Victims

  2. Marc authier….why are you always around to add your crazy ramblings to every single bit of journalism that hits this site ? I’m not saying everything you say is wrong but you definitely know how to give a crazy man spin on it lol…whos paying this guy to discredit every article to hit this site XD? you smell of mischief Marc!

  3. Psychoactive drugs, e.g. mescaline (natural) and LSD (synthetic) and a host of others, have been used by the CIA and the KGB – and no doubt most other secret organizations all over the world – for purposes of brain washing and mind control. I am personally familiar with a wide range of such substances, from DMT to salvinorin to tropane alkaloids etc.etc., having used them recreationally and I have first-hand knowledge of just what they are capable of.
    In the hands of knowledgeable psychopaths, hell-bent on sowing chaos and spreading fear, they are powerful enough to bend somebody’s mind, powerful enough to make people do unspeakable things, such as these shootings.
    There are, of course, other ways to manipulate people into doing the weirdest things. Religious mania is one such platform from which to launch atrocities – Christian crusaders of centuries ago and Islamic jihadists of today come to mind.
    No system of mind-control is fool-proof, however. Given time and beneficial circumstances the victim of mind control can recover and regain control. Recovery would be fatal for the controllers and that’s why you will find that most of the shooters are killed during their shooting spree or “commit suicide”.
    It works better on smart people, high IQ, open mind………….
    You are perfectly right! That’s exactly what the Colorado shooter is! See excerpts below. That’s what almost all such shooters are! For example, Kennedy’s alleged killer Oswald was no moron!
    “No doubt, but isn’t that exactly the kind of “material” that lends itself beautifully to mind-control by the government and its henchmen, among them psychiatry and the pharmaceutical industry.”……………….
    I admit that not every deranged person would make a good victim for mind control.It depends on the nature of the case. But even if somebody cannot be mind-controlled you can still use such a person to set him up as a patsy!
    As for M Bryant we have only the word of those that work for and on behalf of the Australian government that he is a half-wit. Perhaps he hasn’t been programmed at all. All that is necessary is for getting the public to believe that he did it and then make him disappear into an aslum where he cannot give his side of the story. That’s exactly what happened – he is held incommunicado!

    By Chelsea J. Carter, CNN
    August 11, 2012 — Updated 2209 GMT (0609 HKT)

    a) The man accused of opening fire at a Colorado movie theater wanted to study “the primary source of all things, our own minds,” according to a personal statement he submitted as part of a graduate studies application.

    b) Holmes appears to have been accepted for admission, about the same time, to the University of Colorado’s neuroscience program at the Anschutz campus in Aurora.
    One more thing, nothing personal. I am not impressed with psychiatrists. They are every bit as dangerous as these shooters we are talking about. Psychiatry is not a science, nor even a therapeutic system: it is nothing more than a belief system, based on nothing more than the psychiatrists’ hangups, unsupported by any real evidence.

  4. “No doubt, but isn’t that exactly the kind of “material” that lends itself beautifully to mind-control by the government and its henchmen, among them psychiatry and the pharmaceutical industry.”

    Bernard Weckmann I’m a nurse and I work in a psychiatric ward.
    Psychotics and schizophrenics are no more mind controllable than common people, probably less, because they are not very good to adapt. If they were, we would not spend enormous sums and efforts to take care of them. We are unable to have them to take the right pills at the right time we want if they doesn’t collaborate.

    Now, I’m from Italy and psychiatric care here could be a little different from the US (the dosage we use is usually less than the dosage normally used in the US for many drugs but we have a different population with different genetics and culture). If we could control our patients using drugs we would not need to force them to be treated against their will.

    The only way you could control someone mind is to isolate them from their world and feed them with what you want: like in The Truman Show; this is what brainwashing is. It work better on smart people, high IQ, open mind. Not on stupid, dumb, rigid thinking nutcases. And it require a lot of work, a lot of time and a lot of people.

  5. But I’m skeptic about big conspiracies …
    There is no shortage of conspiracy theories and many of them are so bizarre and/or so unlikely that we can safely ignore them. It does not follow that they all are irrelevant and can be ignored. The problem is to ascertain which of them are true, either wholly or in part.

    If big conspiracies could work …
    But hey do work – beautifully! And you, yes, you personally, are a victim of it, I can guarantee! Let me prove this with an example I have first-hand knowledge of. Do you know that the government and all its myriad agencies such as police or the judiciary, have absolutely no authority and jurisdiction over you unless you agree? And did you know that if you assert your rights authorities, so-called, will then have no choice but to leave you alone? Don’t you think you ought to know something as important as this? If you did not know this simple fact, then ask yourself why not. If that’s not a big conspiracy I do not know what is. And it’s one that’s been going on for a very long time.

    Most people do not know because this simple truth is being kept from them – although the truth is coming out and more and more people wake up to the fraud.

    My wife and I have been in court four times and four times we have denied the court the authority and jurisdiction it presumed to have and walked out – unscathed! Don’t believe me? Check my site

    From what I read about the Port Arthur Massacre …
    You have just provided an example of the problem. You only read about it – exactly as I did. Neither of us has first-hand knowledge. How do we know that any of what we read is true?

    Bryant was and is a psychotic with antisocial personality traits…
    No doubt, but isn’t that exactly the kind of “material” that lends itself beautifully to mind-control by the government and its henchmen, amongst them psychiatry and the pharmaceutical industry.

    Is it more reassuring a big government conspiracy or a single psychotic criminal as a justification for a massacre so large? ….
    I think that mature adults do not want or need reasssurance but the truth because only then will we find a solution. Reassurance is for frightened children which unfortunately most people are. A single event of this kind could certainly be blamed on a lone deranged gunman. But if these events pile up as they do in only one country in the world, the US, and if they follow the same pattern ad nauseam and if the same explanations are given over and over again and if these shootings are then followed by exactly the same response of calls for gun control then a lone madman is no longer a plausible explanation. This goes way beyond coincidence.

    As I said before: We can all be fooled, some of the time, yes, but not all of us all of the time.

    But returning to the journalists and their reportage …
    Journalists used to investigate and report on facts, at least as they saw them. Not any more. There are thousands of radio and TV stations, there are thousands of newspapers and magazines, there are thousands of book publishers … all of them owned by just a handful of big corporations. They in turned are owned by a handful of the rich and powerful and their views will make the headlines and no journalist will bite the hand that feeds him.

  6. To Bernard Weckmann:
    All government are criminal and insane. What change is the degree of criminality and insanity.
    Currently we have them all peaking in criminality and insanity.

    I agree with you that any and all governments would be more than happy to seize all weapons kept by free, law abiding, peaceful citizens. I have no doubt about this. This is independent from the character of the politicians and bureaucrats forming the government. it is the dynamic of this type of organization.

    But I’m skeptic about big conspiracies because more people you have more probable is someone will defect for personal gain or some other personal reason. If big conspiracies could work then the government could manage the economy successfully. If they can not do the latter, they can not do the former.

    From what I read about the Port Arthur Massacre, Bryant was and is a psychotic with antisocial personality traits. I have a bit of experience with this type of people, because I work in a psychiatric ward. There is no need to be very smart or very skillful to shot a lot of unarmed people, mainly if these people are of the “deer frozen in front of car lights” variety.

    Is it more reassuring a big government conspiracy or a single psychotic criminal as a justification for a massacre so large? And remember what Richard Feynman told: “You are the easier person you can fool”. And this is the same for all person.

    But returning to the journalists and their reportage: they are rewarded if they write pieces people read. More glamorous the pieces are more people will read them. And if one person claim “two shooters” they will write about two shooters even if many other only claim “one shooter” or “I don’t know”. Then they will rectify later, if they must, or simply drop the ball. Nothing will happen for their wrong reporting. Do you hear of any reporter punished for reporting “two shooters”? If they were part of a big conspiracy they would print immediately the “right” version or they would wait for the right version to print.

    This, I think, is well represented by a short scene in the Spiderman movie of Sam Raimi.
    The journalist interview two females eye witnesses of what Spiderman did, one telling the opposite of the other. Then they must decide who show on TV because they have just so much seconds on air. They go for the prettiest, more credible by the public. They dismiss the punk (Lucy Lawless) witness because they believe the public will not like her even if they think she is telling the truth and the other witness it telling bullshit. Not because of a big conspiracy but because it is what they think their audience accept better.

  7. To Mirco and Carl

    I admit that in the confusion and panic of such an event people can and will misinterpret some of what is going on. But not all of the people all of the time.

    Consider this: assasinations and mass killings have been occurring for decades in the US (and only there!) with clockwork regularity. Followed – with clockwork regularity – by calls for the ban on guns. While witnesses come forward that assert the presence of more than one shooter authorities, so-called, find – with clockwork regularity – that a lone allegedly mentally disturbed gunman was responsible.

    In my country (Australia) we had a similar shooting many years ago, known as the Port Arthur massacre. It was blamed on a lone gunman who can’t even tie his shoe laces let alone shoot straight. And after that guns disappeared!

    There is no pattern? It’s all just conicidence? Nothing to worry about? The government is only protecting you?

    None are as blind as those that do not want to see. Are you unwilling to face unpleasant truth that the government of the US is a criminally insane entity hell-bent on removing the only thing that still stands in the way of a total police state, your guns? Or are you intentionally trying to sow some doubt and confusion in people’s mind?

    To all Americans that can still see what is going on: do not make the mistake that Australians made which was to accept, sheep-like, the ban on guns. If you accept the ban you won’t have anything to defend yourself with when the jack-booted stormtroopers come to get you.

  8. The boy suffered from autism. You can thank MADE USA mass vaccinations campaign for the destruction of his brain functions and these murders. When its not Prozac its autism and vaccination.

  9. Silliness. All these journalists and editors are as competitive as the next person in our society. Do you really think if there is some angle, that they know something no one else is reporting, that they are just going to sit on it to be good servants to the conspiracy.
    No, these people do not care about one job they have, they care about being famous and writing books and making more money, etc. That these low paid people, at least the local reporters, are suddenly going to all keep quiet for the good of a conspiracy is ludicrous. Silly, silly, silly.
    I agree with the last post, in all that confusion, you think you see things, maybe the shooter loses his hat and the second time you see him you think its a second person, maybe you see someone else that looks like they have a gun especially if they are wearing camouflage, etc.
    As for the police, yes, they are grabbing everyone that looks suspicious, I am sure at any event like this you will see other people being led off by the police. They are doing their job.

  10. “Journalists are trained to ask questions” NOT.
    Journalists were, a long time ago, trained to ask questions, now they are not.
    They are trained to write narratives, because this sell more advertisement and adhere better to their world view.

    Organized massacres sell better than unorganized one.
    Many shooters sell better than a single lone gunman.
    A right wing terrorist sell better than a lone nutjob living in her mom basement.

    They wrote first what fitted better to their chosen narrative, then as evidences showed up, they adjusted the narrative to fit the evidences they can not ignore.

    The reason there is always a “second shooter” in these mass murders is simple:
    hearing a lot of shooting people start believing they can not be shoot by a single shooter, so there must be more than one. If the shooter move fast enough (and this don’t need to be very fast) it could appear multiple shooters are shooting from different places.

    It is called “Fog of War”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>