If carbon dioxide is so bad for the planet, why do greenhouse growers buy CO2 generators to double plant growth?

CO2 GreenhouseFor only “pennies a day,” any greenhouse owner can produce CO2 to help increase plant yields in their greenhouses. That’s the message on CO2 generators sold by greenhouse supply companies across the United States and Canada. “1,500 ppm [of carbon dioxide] can be achieved… these generators automatically provide the carbon dioxide needed to meet maximum growing potential for only pennies a day,” the ad says.

View it yourself in this picture taken from a greenhouse supply magazine:

CO2 generators “improve plant quality” and “increase production.” They’re made in the USA and run on propane or natural gas, turning fossil fuels into carbon dioxide.

Why does this work to radically improve plant growth, health and yields? Because — are you ready for the truth? — CO2 is a plant NUTRIENT.

Nope, it’s not a pollutant that threatens human civilization as has been ridiculously claimed by global warming doomsday pushers. CO2 actually increases plant yields, accelerates “re-greening” and improves reforestation of the planet. And while today’s atmosphere contains only 400 ppm of carbon dioxide, CO2 generators can help raise that level to 1500 ppm inside greenhouses, thereby accelerating plant growth and food production.

Here’s the ad so you can see it for yourself:

CO2 generator

Is CO2 is so bad for the planet, why do greenhouses pay to produce it?

If CO2 was so terrible for the planet, then installing a CO2 generator in a greenhouse would kill the plants. But scientists and even governments actually recommend supplementing CO2 in greenhouses in order to boost plant growth and food production.

“The benefits of carbon dioxide supplementation on plant growth and production within the greenhouse environment have been well understood for many years,” says the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food.

“CO2 increases productivity through improved plant growth and vigour. Some ways in which productivity is increased by CO2 include earlier flowering, higher fruit yields, reduced bud abortion in roses, improved stem strength and flower size. Growers should regard CO2 as a nutrient… increasing the CO2 level to 1,000 ppm will increase the photosynthesis by about 50% over ambient CO2 levels.”

In fact, as recent scientific studies have shown, the slight rise in CO2 levels of the atmosphere has actually helped re-green deserts and arid areas, accelerating the growth of trees, shrubs and grasses which produce the oxygen human needs to breathe.

Attacking carbon dioxide is hate speech against Mother Nature

The more you really examine the scientific truth about carbon dioxide rather than the politically-charged “hate speech” against Mother Nature being spewed by people like Al Gore, the more you realize CO2 is a crucial nutrient for the Earth’s environment and ecosystem. In fact, the vast majority of all the CO2 released into the atmosphere is produced by Mother Nature via animals in the ocean. Anyone who criticizes CO2 is attacking ocean life and condemning trillions of aquatic creatures who exhale carbon dioxide as part of their natural respiration. (Should they all be fined?)

As a society interested in reforestation, expanding the diversity of plant life, nourishing trees and re-greening deserts, we should no longer tolerate anyone engaged in hate speech against Mother Nature and CO2. Those who attempt to demonize this critical nutrient for the planet are engaged in a kind of hate-motivated racism against plants.

If it’s not okay to condemn someone for being black, why is it okay for people like Al Gore to engage in endless hate speech against all the living beings that are green?

Besides, all those people who keep sounding the alarm on CO2 are being too negative all the time. Nobody spews more doom and gloom than Al Gore and the global warming crowd who paint apocalyptic pictures of Earth’s future if we all don’t start paying carbon taxes to the super rich. Stop being so negative!

They need to practice more positivity and repeat to themselves affirmations like:

“CO2 is a nutrient for forests.”

“CO2 is produced by ocean life.”

“CO2 brings balance to the global ecosystem.”

“CO2 is to plants as oxygen is to humans.”

“CO2 can help transform barren deserts into sustainable forests.”

Perhaps by staying positive, the global warming fearmongers and doom-and-gloomers can calm down, take a few breaths (with extra CO2) and recognize that what’s good for plants is good for the planet.

In fact, I’m going to hyperventilate after writing this article just to generate a little extra CO2 for the world. It’s my gift to Al Gore.


For the record: NO, I don’t support burning fossil fuels

The No. 1 criticism of this story by the brainwashed hoards of Al Gore cult worshippers will be that I must have been paid big bucks by the coal industry to write this article.

Don’t be ridiculous. I’m the record — for at least a decade — having exhaustively condemned the burning of fossil fuels. Even though the CO2 they release into the atmosphere is actually a nutrient, they release many other pollutants such as sulfur and mercury (from coal). Scrubbers in the USA make U.S. coal plants the cleanest in the world, but China’s coal plants are truly sickening pollution factories.

I also believe it’s time to get humanity off the petrochemical habit and onto something cleaner and more renewable such as low-energy nuclear reactions (LENR), formerly called “cold fusion.” Recent analysis has confirmed, yet again, that cold fusion is real and practical. Cold fusion could be harnessed and used in place of coal to heat large quantities of water that drive steam turbines which generate electricity.

In time, all of America’s coal power plants could be switched over to cold fusion. Similarly, if improved battery technology comes along, gasoline-powered vehicles could be switched over to electricity, and if that electricity is powered by cold fusion, then it’s clean all the way through the energy supply chain.

Fossil fuels are dirty business: they’re dirty to extract from the ground, dirty to transport and dirty to burn. But the CO2 they produce is not a pollutant; it’s a nutrient that’s desperately needed by trees, grasses and shrubs all around the world. So while there are lots of reasons to oppose the burning of fossil fuels around our planet, CO2 is not legitimately one of them.

If all this talk makes you hyperventilate, then feel free to experience a hefty dose of self-inflicted guilt that you can alleviate only by sending all your money to Al Gore for all the carbon dioxide you’re generating.

- CO2 myth busted: Why we need more carbon dioxide to grow food and forests
- Carbon tax proven useless against global warming
- United Nations global warming propaganda exposed
- Australia’s Carbon Tax contributing to record business failures
- Global warming debunked: NASA report verifies carbon dioxide actually cools atmosphere
- Lord Monckton kicked out of UN climate summit for exposing global warming fraud
Al Gore purchases $9 million dollar mansion: consumes more energy than an entire working class neighborhood

Source: http://www.naturalnews.com/040890_greenhouses_carbon_dioxide_generators_plant_growth.html

Check Also

Arctic Ice

Global cooling, not warming: Arctic ice cap grows 60% in one year

For years, we’ve all heard that global warming is threatening our planet. But now, in ...


  1. Hey I have been trying to get people aware of technology to get 5 times the fuel mileage suppressed by oil companies for 80 years. Sounds unbelievable but I sell my book for 20 Money back guarantee with over 2500 sold only 2 refunds with 90 % free at web site ( no Spaces) him acre search dot com others sites Byron wine dot com Rex research dot com 100 MPG with a V 8 is not a myth. we have proof of suppression

    90 % less pollution, great affect to climate. Some one help me help us all !!!

  2. i believe i believe


  3. bill gates does want it down to zero . that is someone . someone who wants it to be zero . http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3WXcRfsrTQ and this person who is funding geo engineering projects who says we need to get it down to ZERO. along with popluation of course. what could go wrong with an open eugenicist with almost unlimited funds involved with that. what are the current levels of CO2 in the atmosphere ? when its in the 0. ### range . i belive that is closer to the zero end than the high end i believe.. but zero being close to zero may have to be peer reviewed to be official narrative fact. . retards call it a pollutant yet are yet to show it on a list of schedualed polutants. and also with no proof say its the symptom of to much co2 yet always dismiss that heat causes more co2. because the science is settled lol and because todays corrupted science that depends on towing a line to maintain funding is so credible …. science now never changes .. and is political. i mean for fucks sake.. the UN who pushes all this shit because they want every nation to pay them a carbon tax had a comittee meeting where they just voted to decide water no longer hydrates and they sun does not effect the climate. science is now based on a vote…

  4. No one wants to ride the world of CO2, most know this would kill the planet’s eco system, and us therefor, but we do want to keep it from being excessive, again as I started earlier, there is obviously an insane high level of CO2 that would kill us, you make it sound like we have no reason to keep it from reaching that point and the far off, and that every positive statement about CO2 you said can be true while there can still be too much CO2 causing higher temperatures.

  5. This is so horribly awful reporting… you simply have zero understanding… no one said CO2 kills plants, most people aren’t AMAZED by this secret they learned it at like 12 in science class. They also learned CO2 will kill you! Seriously if you are stuck in a room with no new air the CO2 you emit will kill you before you run out of oxygen usually, again, not a signifigantly new fact to most people. Its bad because it DOES raise the temperature which this article doesnt talk about, this article seems to be, are you really dumb and think CO2 is killing the world directly as a poision? you are wrong, it does other bad stuff, but you can still grow weed with it. geez, you totally flip out about this evil hate speech while not addressing the actual arguments you are talking about, its really super lazy of you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>