BitCoin seen through the eyes of a central banker

bitcoin moneyTo us, the ECB’s superficial, amusing take on BitCoin was merely a source of (Friday) humor.

To others, such as Tuur Demeester, the ECB’s report on “Virtual Currency Schemes” which was merely a confused attempt to validate the Euro by bashing a prototype electronic currency that others have written far more informed articles on, has far more profound insights into central banker mentality.

We are skeptical: the ECB has far more existential issues to worry about than whether people will be paying for that house in Calabria with BitCoin (they won’t; at least not any time soon), such as how fast until Spain and Greece run out of rehypothecatable and repoable assets, that allow the ECB to continue creating its own version of electronic money (in this case named Euro) out of thin air.

But for those seeking more than what meets the central-planner’s eye (because what better ploy than to divert attention from where it truly needs to be focused: such as Spanish bonds for example getting a 0% haircut instead of 5%), here are some answers to the question whether “the CB’s toolbox have what it takes to contain a private, decentralised cryptocurrency? Or: Bitcoin seen through the eyes of a central banker.”

From Tuur Demeester: “The Gloom Of Central Banking

On october 29th, the ECB published a 55-?page report titled “Virtual Currency Schemes”. With this dysphemistic title, the central bank refers to private, unregulated initiatives of virtual currency. With 183 references in the text, it seems obvious that specifically the fast growing peer to peer currency Bitcoin is under scrutiny.

In what follows, I sketch an evolution of how central banks—the monopolists of the current fiat money paradigm—have dealt with the threat of free market competition coming from the internet, and how they are now reacting to the sudden appearance of an enigmatic rival.

Be warned that this is a subjective take on the issue. People from central bank and government circles will no doubt accuse me of being unbalanced and unfair in my interpretations and conclusions. So be it. my goal here is to scrape off the veneer of these reports and thus catch a glimpse of what may actually be happening behind the closed doors of Basel and Brussels.

Full report (pdf)


Check Also


Petrodollar exports negative in 2014, first time in 18 years

Two years ago, in hushed tones at first, then ever louder, the financial world began ...


  1. Central banking and national-socialism (NAZISM) go hand in hand. They hate private entreprise except the ones they control naturally. No difference between Warburg and Adolf Hitler. The FED originally was founded by a german fascist Warburg who was the banker of the Kaiser and also a good friend of Lenin. Just proves the nature of central bankers. Fascists nazis and eugenist scum who fear private initiave and real markets. These parasites from hell are in the business of rigged markets, monopoly, genocide and rape. They are ALL nazis. All of them are monopoly men, con men and sociopaths.

  2. Central banking is a counterfeit racket. We have to arrest them and try them for what they are. Criminals and terrorists,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>