Are corporations masquerading as government in Australia & world wide?

Would you be surprised to find a company with the same name as your country registered with the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) in Washington DC? Well, guess what?! Among those listed as corporate entities by the United States SEC are:

Israel,¬†Turkey,¬†Italy,¬†Hungary,¬†Sweden,¬†Finland,Argentina,¬†Colombia,¬†Brazil,¬†The Philippines,¬†South Korea,¬†Japan,¬†Jamaica,¬†South Africa,¬†Canada,Australia‚Ķ and my personal favourite (and I quote) ‚ÄúHer Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Alberta as represented by Alberta Investment Management Corp.‚ÄĚ

Interesting! So what could all this mean? For the purpose of this article we will follow the example of Australia.

Commonwealth Australia

Left: The Great Seal of the United Kingdom, atop the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900.
Right: The Great Seal of Australia, a trademark registered with United States Patent and Trademark Office.

Australia…. the lucky country?

  • SEC Entity Name:¬†COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
  • SEC Central Index Key (CIK): 0000805157
  • SEC Standard Industrial Code (SIC): 8880 (UNKNOWN)
  • SEC Business Address:¬†1601 MASSACHUSETTS AVE NW¬†WASHINGTON DC 20036
  • Fiscal Year End: 0630

Well, that certainly raises some questions!

Why is a company called ‚ÄėCOMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA‚Äô registered in Washington DC? What reason could there be for a country to be registered as a company?

By definition, aren’t corporate and government entities mutually exclusive? And doesn’t government regulate companies?

Why would Australia be registered with the SEC in the United States? And why would it provide a ‚ÄėProspectus‚Äô and annual ‚ÄėEconomic and Fiscal Outlook‚Äô documents to the SEC? And be subject to SEC regulation?

Why is the Great Seal of Australia a trademark registered with United States Patent and Trademark Office?

Could the ‚ÄėAustralian Government‚Äô be a corporate entity masquerading as real government, for profit, and not for the purpose of governance? Does the ‚ÄėAustralian Government‚Äô truly represent ‚Äúthe people‚ÄĚ and not shareholders in another country?

Why do today‚Äôs government departments have corporate mission statements like ‚Äúwe provide services¬†on BEHALF¬†of government‚ÄĚ and ‚Äúour CLIENTS¬†include government‚Ķ‚ÄĚ?

What happened to ‚Äúwe¬†ARE¬†government‚ÄĚ?? Does this suggest they are NOT true government, but a company masquerading as government?

If a company registered in Washington DC is falsely claiming government status in Australia, what happened to the real (de jure) government with a similar name? And when?

And are the laws in Australia therefore just rules for employees and contractors of the corporation?

Interesting. Let’s look a little closer…

Perhaps it is a requirement that the Commonwealth of Australia registers as a company entity in order to trade with the United States of America. Are all the other countries who trade with the United States also registered on the American SEC? Is ‚Äėthe United States of America‚Äô also registered with ASIC, the Australian Securities & Investments Commission? And is Australia similarly registered with the corresponding trade regulators in other countries?

The answer appears to be NO.

International trade implies mutual agreement; reciprocity; a common method of exchange. But the reality is that the ‚ÄėCOMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA‚Äô is registered as a corporate entity with the United States SEC, but not the other way around. There appear to be no comparable corporate entities registered in other countries with which Australia trades. And nations ranking among the United States‚Äô biggest trading partners do NOT have corporate avatars registered with the American SEC. Perhaps registration in Washington DC is for the purpose of trading Government Bonds. Interesting‚Ķ

… But this strange corporate entity is only half the story. Before government bonds can even exist, surely there must first be a legitimate government.

Government and the role of Governor-General in Australia

In Australia, the Governor-General¬†is the representative of the Monarch (currently Queen Elizabeth II) and the Administrator of Government. Given that the Governor-General administers government in Australia, government can only exist in Australia with a valid Governor-General. The Governor-General is reliant upon the existence of the ‚ÄėOffice of Governor-General‚Äô, which was originally constituted by the late Queen Victoria in Letters Patent dated 29th¬†October 1900, passed under the Monarch‚Äôs seal ‚Äď the Great Seal Of The United Kingdom (view Letters Patent 1900).

The power and authority to revoke, alter or amend those Letters Patent was reserved by the late Queen Victoria to her heirs and successors. Given those Letters Patent were issued under the ‚ÄėGreat Seal of the United Kingdom‚Äô, surely any revocation, alteration or amendment must be issued by an heir and successor under the same Seal.

So what’s the problem?

In 1984, Letters Patent supposedly revoked the original Letters Patent of 1900 and provided new provisions for the Office of Governor-General¬†(view Letters Patent 1984). This happened under the ‚ÄėGreat Seal of Australia‚Äô, which we already know is a corporate trademark registered with the United States Patent & Trademark Office in the U.S.¬†(view registration)

Surely such an attempt at revocation cannot therefore be lawful? And if not, what Office is the Governor-General in Australia presently occupying? Is the person we call ‚ÄúGovernor-General‚ÄĚ truly a representative of an ‚Äúheir and successor‚ÄĚ to the late Queen Victoria?

The answer appears to be NO.

Given that the Governor-General appoints Ministers, Judges, Commissioners and Justices of the Peace, and ascribes Royal Assent as the Monarch‚Äôs representative in Australia ‚Äď using the¬†Monarch‚Äôs Seal¬†‚Äď in the absence of a valid Governor-General,¬†are there any legitimate government offices in Australia?

Again… the answer appears to be NO.

So let’s test the theory…

A case study

Wake Up World friend and colleague Scott Bartle¬†documented his recent dealings¬†with ‚ÄėAustralian Customs & Border Protection Service‚Äô in his self-funded documentary ‚ÄúWhat The FUQ? ‚Äď Frequently Unanswered Questions of the Australian Government‚ÄĚ.

This simple, concise and sometimes hilarious case-study follows Scott‚Äôs ongoing interactions with a supposed ‚Äúgovernment‚ÄĚ entity that simply does not behave as a genuine government agency should.

And all he did was ask them to demonstrate their validity!

Documentary Trailer ‚Äď What The FUQ Trailer (2:47 mins)

[youtube height=”400″ width=”550″]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeYQNq7znH4[/youtube]

 

To view this documentary in full, Click here. I highly recommended it.

So‚Ķ IS the ‚ÄúAustralian Government‚ÄĚ the same government the original Office of Governor-General was intended to Administer?

It‚Äôs a question that officials at all levels of ‚ÄúAustralian Government‚ÄĚ have seem unwilling or unable to answer. Some readers may think I‚Äôm a crack-pot for even asking the question. ‚ÄúBreak out the tin-foil hats!‚ÄĚ they‚Äôll cry! But please‚Ķ Before you form an opinion or post a comment on this article, ask the Australian Government the same question yourself:

Can you please demonstrate that today’s Office of Governor-General is the same Office that was constituted by the late Queen Victoria in Letters Patent of 1900?

It is your right, after all. And there are certainly some details that don’t add up. But it gets better….

That’s odd, they certainly don’t ACT like a true government.

At first ‚ÄúGovernment‚ÄĚ may just ignore you. But since anyone claiming government status has a responsibility to prove it, their¬†silence is very indicative, don‚Äôt you think? So push your Government a little further, and see what happens when you really start to question who‚Äôs who. Taxes & fines are suddenly waived, and miraculously, licenses & permits are no longer required! And it¬†doesn‚Äôt¬†stop there.

Does this sound like the behaviour of legitimate government? NO, it does not. If challenged, does a legitimate government not simply demonstrate its validity and continue to act within its lawful authority? Or does legitimate government exempt that person‚Äôs responsibilities and wave them through the gates, quickly, quietly and with a minimum of fuss? ‚ÄúNothing to see here!‚ÄĚ

Is this situation unique to Australia?

Let’s find out!

To our friends and readers from the Commonwealth of Australia, we recommend you contact your local Members and Senators and ask them one simple question:

Can you please demonstrate that today’s Office of Governor-General is the same Office that was constituted by the late Queen Victoria in Letters Patent of 1900?

To our friends and readers outside Australia, we recommend you identify the documents that established the original offices of government in your country, then ask one simple question of your government representatives:

Can you please demonstrate that today’s government is the same one as established at the inception of this country?

Demonstrating its own legitimacy is a very simple thing that every government agency should be able to do. And in a true democracy, silence is an unacceptable response of government to questions of its very legitimacy. But today the ‚ÄúAustralian Government‚ÄĚ appears unwilling or unable to prove its legitimacy.

Is yours?

It only takes a few minutes to write to your local member’s office. Please come back to Wake Up World and tell our readers how your enquiry was met. Silence? Jargon? Or a simple demonstration of your government’s legitimacy?

We’d love to hear your stories, so please leave a comment or send us an email

So what the FUQ do we do next?

Written enquiries made to Ministers and Government agencies, to the Office of the Prime Minister and to the Office of Governor General remain unanswered. So in the absence of a response from Government, Wake Up World supports respectfully escalating this matter to the current Monarch, Her Majesty, The Queen.

Surely¬†Her Majesty must know the answer; why a corporation in the United States bears the name ‚ÄėCOMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA‚Äô; why in 1984 her authority to amend the provisions for the Office of Governor-General was granted on a company letterhead; why those claiming to represent true government in Australia have been unable to prove that status; and why some, when challenged, may suddenly overlook one‚Äôs obligations and run silently in the other direction.

SIGN THE PETITION

…and ask Her Majesty for the truth.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

…we all have a right to know.

HOLD YOUR GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABLE

…it is just one simple question.

In a true democracy, silence is an unacceptable answer of government to questions of its legitimacy.

Source: http://www.wakingtimes.com/2012/11/30/are-corporations-masquerading-as-government-in-australia-world-wide/

 

6 comments

  1. Lee-Kaye Tonkin-Jones

    Noel
    We have COMMON LAW and the CONSTITUTION of the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH. !
    STAND UP FOR THEM
    LIVE THEM
    TEACH THEM
    BREATHE THEM

    PROTEST WHEN ‘THEY’ AND ‘WE'[ARE THREATENED
    ‘WE THE PEOPLE’ WILL RALLY
    IT’S THE AUSTRALIAN WAY

  2. I forgot to mention the human being has god given rights under Common law, but we now have Admiralty law, so they have taken our rights too. Australia was once a Common law Country. Do you still believe you are FREE.

  3. Every so called Government entity in Australia is a for profit Corporation. A Corporation can only make laws for it’s employees, yet they make laws to tax our wages, our shopping, our properties, vehicles, they confiscate our properties, make us pay for licences, permits, fees, tolls, passports and heaps more or they jail us. They sold off all the peoples utilities to other Corporations, now we all pay more for everything. They make us ask them for permission to do almost everything by application form, we are forced by blackmail to do a lot of things, or we are not entitled to benefits. We are THEIR SLAVES.

  4. Australian Embassy address in America: 1601 Massachusetts Ave, NW Washington DC 20036 – Telephone: (202) 797 3000 – Fax: (202) 797 3168

  5. That would mean that ALL of the “government” debt that is being piled onto the tax payers is actually the PRIVATE debt of these corporations.
    Debt which has been taken onboard by government employees whao are actually employees of a private corporation.
    ODIOUS DEBT indeed

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>